Three-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of left ventricular volume and function in comparison with computed tomography and echocardiography

• Published in: Medicine (Baltimore) Vol. 102; no. 15; p. e33549
• Main Authors: Guo, Fu-Qian, Wu, Bai-Lin, Liu, Xiao-Wei, Pan, Tong, Gao, Bu-Lang, Li, Cai-Ying
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 14.04.2023
• Subjects: Echocardiography; Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Observational Study; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods; Ventricular Function, Left
• ISSN: 0025-7974; 1536-5964
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033549

This study investigated the correlation between 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 256 multiple-slice computed tomography (MSCT) or 2-dimensional echocardiography (ECHO) in evaluating left ventricle. Forty patients were retrospectively enrolled to undergo cardiac MSCT, 3-Tesla MRI and 2-dimensional ECHO within 1 week. The end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV) and ejection fraction (EF) were analyzed and compared. MSCT was highly significantly correlated with MRI. Compared with MRI, MSCT slightly overestimated ESV for about 8.7 mL, but slightly underestimated EF and SV for about 6.8% and 5.8 mL, respectively. A high consistency existed between MSCT and MRI, with the 95% limit of agreement (-19.6, 25.4) mL for EDV, (-2.6,20.1) mL for ESV, (-28.3,16.6) mL for SV, and (-18.8%,5.1) % for EF. ECHO was also significantly correlated with MRI. The ECHO slightly underestimated the left ventricular function compared with MRI, with an underestimation of 9.4 mL for EDV, 3.5 mL for ESV, 5.8 mL for SV and 1.0% for EF. A wider agreement limit existed between MRI and ECHO. MSCT has a better correlation and agreement relationship with MRI parameters than 2-dimensional ECHO in assessing the left ventricle and may serve as a possible alternative to MRI.