Standard reference and percentiles of maximum respiratory pressures values of healthy children aged 7-10 years

This study aims to present standard reference for values of maximum respiratory pressures of healthy schoolchildren, according to gender. This is a cross-sectional study involving healthy children aged 7-10 years. Data of body mass and height were evaluated to calculate body mass index (BMI). In add...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRevista Paulista de Pediatria Vol. 40; p. e2021007
Main Authors Schivinski, Camila Isabel Santos, Wamosy, Renata Maba Gonçalves, Parazzi, Paloma Lopes Francisco, Morcillo, André Moreno
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Brazil Sociedade de Pediatria de São Paulo 01.01.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study aims to present standard reference for values of maximum respiratory pressures of healthy schoolchildren, according to gender. This is a cross-sectional study involving healthy children aged 7-10 years. Data of body mass and height were evaluated to calculate body mass index (BMI). In addition, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and maximal expiratory pressure values were evaluated according to the American Thoracic Society. The maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and data of maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) obtained in the study showed normal distribution and curves were built by the Lambda-Mu-Sigma (LMS) method, as well as the values of MIP and MEP percentiles 3, 10, 25, 50, 75, 90, and 97 for each gender. MIP and MEP data were collected from 399 schoolchildren. All schoolchildren in the sample had adequate FEV1 and BMI. The study showed an increase in respiratory pressure values with age progression. The MIP and MEP values of girls were of 53.4±11.0 and 61.8±12.5cmH2O, respectively, and those of boys were 59.9±13.6 and 69.6±15.7cmH2O, respectively. Normal curves and percentiles were developed for MIP and MEP values of healthy schoolchildren. The extreme percentiles (3rd and 97th) were determined, and a specific graph was elaborated for each group. These graphs may help clinical follow-up and therapeutic monitoring of different pediatric populations.
Bibliography:The authors declare there is no conflict of interests.
Declaration
Authors’ contribution
Study design: Schivinski CIS, Morcillo AM. Data collection: Wamosy RMG, Parazzi PLF. Data analysis: Morcillo AM. Manuscript writing: Wamosy RMG, Schivinski CIS, Parazzi PLF, Morcillo AM. Manuscript revision: Schivinski CIS. Study supervision: Schivinski CIS, Morcillo AM.
Conflict of interests
The database that originated the article is available with the corresponding author.
ISSN:0103-0582
1984-0462
DOI:10.1590/1984-0462/2022/40/2021007IN