A systematic evaluation of token economies as a classroom management tool for students with challenging behavior

• Published in: Journal of school psychology Vol. 49; no. 5; pp. 529 - 554
• Main Authors: Maggin, Daniel M., Chafouleas, Sandra M., Goddard, Katelyn M., Johnson, Austin H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2011; Elsevier
• Subjects: Behavior Disorders; Behavior Therapy - methods; Challenging behaviour; Child; Child Behavior - psychology; Child Behavior Disorders - psychology; Child Behavior Disorders - therapy; Classroom behaviour; Classroom management; Classroom management Contingency management Quantitative synthesis; Classroom Techniques; Effect Size; Evaluation; Evidence; Humans; Meta Analysis; Schools; Single-subject; Strength; Student Behavior; Students - psychology; Systematic review; Token economies; Token Economy; Token economy; Systematic review; Classroom management Contingency management Quantitative synthesis; Single-subject
• ISSN: 0022-4405; 1873-3506; 1873-3506
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.05.001

A two-part systematic review was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of token economies in increasing rates of appropriate classroom behavior for students demonstrating behavioral difficulties. The first part of the review utilized the recently published What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) standards for evaluating single-subject research to determine the extent to which eligible studies demonstrated sufficient evidence to classify the token economy as an evidence-based practice. The second part of the review employed meta-analytic techniques across four different types of effect sizes to evaluate the quantitative strength of the findings. Methodological strengths and weaknesses across the studies were systematically investigated. Results indicated that the extant research on token economies does not provide sufficient evidence to be deemed best-practice based on the WWC criteria. ► The evidence-base for the effects of token economies on student behavior was reviewed. ► Systematic coding of study features, quantitative synthesis, and visual analyses were used to evaluate studies. ► The internal validity of studies precluded labeling token economies an evidence-based practice. ► However, there was some quantitative evidence to suggest that well-executed programs can be effective.