Mediterranean Aquaculture and Genetic Pollution: A Review Combined with Data from a Fish Farm Evaluating the Ecological Risks of Finfish Escapes
Mediterranean finfish aquaculture is mainly represented by the production of the gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) and sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) growing in marine cage farms. Despite the numerous benefits of fish farming, the ecological risk potentially caused by fish escapes to the wild popu...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of marine science and engineering Vol. 11; no. 7; p. 1405 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Basel
MDPI AG
01.07.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Mediterranean finfish aquaculture is mainly represented by the production of the gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) and sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) growing in marine cage farms. Despite the numerous benefits of fish farming, the ecological risk potentially caused by fish escapes to the wild populations is occasionally high. In the current study, an integrated review of fish escapes is presented regarding S. aurata and D. labrax escapes and their potential effect on the genetic composition of wild populations. The collected data from the literature are combined and discussed along with recorded escapes in a fish farm located in the Aegean Sea, Greece. According to these records, fish escapes present a generally stable rate, ranging between 0 and 2% in each escape event, which occur 5–8 times per year. Although for other farmed fish species worldwide, the ecological risk may be higher, this risk is probably lower in Mediterranean finfish populations, which are characterized by generally low levels of genetic differentiation. Nevertheless, the risk of genetic introgression still exists. Particularly in sea bream and sea bass farming, genetic structure and differentiation in wild populations seem to be unaffected for now. Nevertheless, suitable management measurements would be a useful strategy to avoid future negative effects of fish escapes. These strategies should be focused on further efforts towards recapture program development, reduced escapees’ survival, and proper legislation. Furthermore, more data on escapees’ survival percentage, their migration pathways, and the way these pathways relate to mortality, the type of escape event, and the season of release would be also valuable. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2077-1312 2077-1312 |
DOI: | 10.3390/jmse11071405 |