Cancer Support Groups: Client Outcome and the Context of Group Process

Objective: This project had two questions: (a) To what extent did clients improve after participation in the cancer support groups? and (b) What was the relationship between outcome and clients’ perceptions of group process? Method: Clients participating in 12 cancer support groups were administered...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inResearch on social work practice Vol. 9; no. 5; pp. 541 - 554
Main Authors Magen, Randy H., Glajchen, Myra
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications 01.09.1999
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: This project had two questions: (a) To what extent did clients improve after participation in the cancer support groups? and (b) What was the relationship between outcome and clients’ perceptions of group process? Method: Clients participating in 12 cancer support groups were administered the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), a consumer satisfaction questionnaire, and a self-report version of Yalom’s Curative Factors Questionnaire. Results: BSI results pointed to statistically significant reductions in emotional distress. About one third of the clients moved into the normative distribution of the BSI from the distressed distribution. The group processes with the highest mean scores were cohesion, existential factors, instillation of hope, altruism, and universality. There were no significant correlations between BSI scores and group processes. Conclusion: These results are discussed in terms of the need to identify both the outcome and process of support group participation as well as establish an empirical link between the two.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1049-7315
1552-7581
DOI:10.1177/104973159900900502