Can the Antisecretory Factor Be Considered a New Therapy for the Short Bowel Syndrome?

Background and objective: The antisecretory factor (AF) exerts antisecretory and anti-inflammatory properties in the bowel. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of exogenous AF (Salovum) or cereals stimulating the endogenous AF (SPC-Flakes), given alone or in combination, in patients wit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNutrition and metabolic insights Vol. 12; p. 1178638819852061
Main Authors Viggiani, Maria Teresa, Di Leo, Alfredo, Barone, Michele
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 2019
Sage Publications Ltd
SAGE Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and objective: The antisecretory factor (AF) exerts antisecretory and anti-inflammatory properties in the bowel. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of exogenous AF (Salovum) or cereals stimulating the endogenous AF (SPC-Flakes), given alone or in combination, in patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS). Methods: Patients received Salovum alone at T0 -T1, Salovum plus SPC-Flakes at T1 -T2, and SPC-Flakes alone at T2 -T3. At T0 and T3, water balance, weight, lean mass (FFM), total body water (TBW), extracellular water (ECW), and nutritional and inflammatory biochemical parameters were evaluated. The water balance was also measured at T1, T2, and 30 days (TS) from the end of treatment. Results: Among the 7 patients enrolled, 2 discontinued treatment due to side effects and 1 was excluded after a cancer was diagnosed. Salovum alone or with SPC-Flakes did not improve the intestinal absorption in patients with SBS, while the administration of SPC-Flakes alone lead towards a trend of increased faecal volume. Weight, FFM, TBW, and ECW, as well as nutritional and inflammatory status, did not statistically change at the end of treatment (T3) as compared with T0. At TS water balance was restored. Conclusion: The administration of exogenous AF or the stimulation of endogenous AF seems to be unable to offer an effective therapy in patients with SBS. On the contrary, their administration appears to aggravate fluid loss and induce side effects.
ISSN:1178-6388
1178-6388
DOI:10.1177/1178638819852061