Semantic relations between encoding and retrieval in cued recall

Two experiments were conducted to test an encoding-specificity hypothesis. In experiment 1, Ss (N = 20 Ms, 20 Fs) were presented pairs of coordinates to study, followed by a cued-recall test. Semantically weak & strong coordinates (defined by degree of featural overlap) served as encoding &...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMemory & cognition Vol. 11; no. 6; pp. 651 - 659
Main Authors LOW, L. A, RODER, B. J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Austin, TX Psychonomic Society 01.11.1983
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Two experiments were conducted to test an encoding-specificity hypothesis. In experiment 1, Ss (N = 20 Ms, 20 Fs) were presented pairs of coordinates to study, followed by a cued-recall test. Semantically weak & strong coordinates (defined by degree of featural overlap) served as encoding & retrieval cues. The semantic strength of the cue was the most important factor in recall. In experiment 2 (N = 28), three N coordinates of varied semantic interrelatedness were recalled in the same manner as experiment 1. Maximum recall was achieved when a strong encoding condition was matched with a strong retrieval cue. Results suggest that semantic relationships are important to recall & that shared features contribute to successful recollection. 3 Tables, 2 Appendixes, 19 References. Modified HA
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0090-502X
1532-5946
DOI:10.3758/BF03198290