Comparison of Condition Rating Systems for Bridges in Three European Countries

• Published in: Applied sciences Vol. 13; no. 22; p. 12343
• Main Authors: Matos, José C., Nicoletti, Vanni, Kralovanec, Jakub, Sousa, Hélder S., Gara, Fabrizio, Moravcik, Martin, Morais, Maria J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.11.2023
• Subjects: bridge assessment; Bridges; Classification; Comparative analysis; Cultural heritage; Decision-making; European condition rating system; Fatalities; Infrastructure; Infrastructure (Economics); infrastructures; standardization; Portugal; Slovakia; Italy
• ISSN: 2076-3417; 2076-3417
• DOI: 10.3390/app132212343

Europe faces many problems connected to ageing infrastructure which was built in the second half of the 20th century. Bridges are one of the crucial elements of these infrastructures. In recent years, European countries have witnessed many failures of bridges across the continent. For example, the collapse of Viadotto Polcevera in Genoa caught the attention of society regarding its tragic consequences. Therefore, engineers must deal with the assessment of existing bridges which is essential for proper decision-making. Condition rating systems for bridges vary from country to country. Consequently, these differences in the methodology can lead to different conclusions related to the future service of assessed structures. For these reasons, this paper briefly describes condition rating systems for road bridges in Italy, Slovakia, and Portugal and defines the differences in the methodology. Subsequently, the obtained conclusions are compared and discussed. The aim of the paper is to encourage standardization in the assessment of bridge health conditions within European countries, highlighting the differences in the current systems adopted by various countries.