Additional Value of Machine-Learning Computed Tomographic Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve Compared to Standard Computed Tomographic Angiography

• Published in: Journal of clinical medicine Vol. 9; no. 3; p. 676
• Main Authors: Lossnitzer, Dirk, Chandra, Leonard, Rutsch, Marlon, Becher, Tobias, Overhoff, Daniel, Janssen, Sonja, Weiss, Christel, Borggrefe, Martin, Akin, Ibrahim, Pfleger, Stefan, Baumann, Stefan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 03.03.2020; MDPI
• Subjects: Adenosine; Atherosclerosis; Calcification; Cardiology; Cardiovascular disease; Clinical medicine; Consortia; Coronary vessels; Ischemia; Medical imaging; Noise; Patients; Radiation; Software; Stents; Tomography; Work stations; Germany; atherosclerosis; coronary artery disease; coronary CT angiography; non-invasive test; revascularization; CT derived fractional flow reserve; fractional flow reserve; coronary physiology
• ISSN: 2077-0383; 2077-0383
• DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030676

Machine-learning-based computed-tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR ) obtains a hemodynamic index in coronary arteries. We examined whether it could reduce the number of invasive coronary angiographies (ICA) showing no obstructive lesions. We further compared CT-FFR -derived measurements to clinical and CT-derived scores. We retrospectively selected 88 patients (63 ± 11years, 74% male) with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) who underwent clinically indicated coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) and ICA. cCTA image data were processed with an on-site prototype CT-FFR software. CT-FFR revealed an index of >0.80 in coronary vessels of 48 (55%) patients. This finding was corroborated in 45 (94%) patients by ICA, yet three (6%) received revascularization. In patients with an index ≤ 0.80, three (8%) of 40 were identified as false positive. A total of 48 (55%) patients could have been retained from ICA. CT-FFR (AUC = 0.96, ≤ 0.0001) demonstrated a higher diagnostic accuracy compared to the pretest probability or CT-derived scores and showed an excellent sensitivity (93%), specificity (94%), positive predictive value (PPV; 93%) and negative predictive value (NPV; 94%). CT-FFR could be beneficial for clinical practice, as it may identify patients with CAD without hemodynamical significant stenosis, and may thus reduce the rate of ICA without necessity for coronary intervention.