A comparative study among WS2, MoS2 and graphene based surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor
•Comparative performance study of WS2, MoS2 and graphene based SPR biosensor.•Ag with BaTiO3 nanolayer shows enhances sensitivity with significant detection accuracy.•The maximum sensitivity 2350/RIU corresponds to two layer WS2 configuration.•Number of layers of these 2D materials (WS2, MoS2 and gr...
Saved in:
Published in | Sensors and actuators reports Vol. 2; no. 1; p. 100015 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier B.V
01.11.2020
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •Comparative performance study of WS2, MoS2 and graphene based SPR biosensor.•Ag with BaTiO3 nanolayer shows enhances sensitivity with significant detection accuracy.•The maximum sensitivity 2350/RIU corresponds to two layer WS2 configuration.•Number of layers of these 2D materials (WS2, MoS2 and graphene) largely affects the performance of sensor.
In the present paper, we propose a new design of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor having better performance parameters by employing the well-known transfer matrix method. The proposed SPR sensor is comprised of BK-7 prism-ZnO-Ag-BaTiO3-Transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs, mainly WS2 and MoS2)/Graphene. A comparison is made among their performance parameters i.e. sensitivity, detection accuracy, quality parameter with other traditional reported SPR sensor. We have also analysed full width at half maxima (FWHM) and electric field intensity enhancement factor (EFIEF) for the proposed SPR sensor. On comparison, it is found that the proposed SPR sensor with monolayer WS2 configuration has better sensitivity of 180°/RIU as compared to monolayer MoS2 and graphene which are 174°/RIU and 157°/RIU respectively. However, the proposed SPR sensor with graphene layer shows small FWHM, higher quality parameter and detection accuracy. We have found that maximum sensitivity of 2350/RIU corresponds to the two-layer WS2 configuration. Our proposed SPR sensor shows better performance as compared to the other reported works. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2666-0539 2666-0539 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.snr.2020.100015 |