Using propensity score-based weighting in the evaluation of health management programme effectiveness

When the randomized controlled trial is unfeasible, programme evaluators attempt to emulate the randomization process in observational studies by creating a control group that is essentially equivalent to the treatment group on known characteristics and trust that the remaining unknown characteristi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of evaluation in clinical practice Vol. 16; no. 1; pp. 175 - 179
Main Authors Linden, Ariel, Adams, John L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:When the randomized controlled trial is unfeasible, programme evaluators attempt to emulate the randomization process in observational studies by creating a control group that is essentially equivalent to the treatment group on known characteristics and trust that the remaining unknown characteristics are inconsequential and will not bias the results. In recent years, adjustment procedures based on the propensity score, such as matching and subclassification, have become increasingly popular. A new technique that has particular appeal for evaluating health management programmes uses the propensity score to create a weight based on the subject's inverse probability of receiving treatment. This weighting mechanism removes imbalances of pre‐intervention characteristics between treated and non‐treated individuals, and is then used within a regression framework to provide unbiased estimates of treatment effects. This paper presents a non‐technical introduction of this technique by illustrating its implementation with data from a recent study estimating the impact of a motivational interviewing‐based health coaching on patient activation measure scores in a chronically ill group of individuals. Because of its relative simplicity and tremendous utility, propensity‐score weighting adjustment should be considered as an alternative procedure for use with observational data to evaluate health management programme effectiveness.
Bibliography:istex:4FE5B440707CBFC08C427DC1DC9FC0ADF8A0A0EB
ark:/67375/WNG-1STWNHX8-Q
ArticleID:JEP1219
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1356-1294
1365-2753
1365-2753
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01219.x