Effect of Net Fiber Reinforcement Surface Treatment on Soft Denture Liner Retention and Longevity
Purpose: To evaluate shear bond strength of Molloplast‐B soft liner attached to different acrylic surfaces (smooth, rough, and Sticktech net fiber‐reinforced interfaces) after 3000 thermal cycles. Materials and Methods: Sixty‐nine specimens were fabricated by attaching Molloplast‐B soft liner to acr...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of prosthodontics Vol. 19; no. 4; pp. 258 - 262 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Malden, USA
Blackwell Publishing Inc
01.06.2010
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Purpose: To evaluate shear bond strength of Molloplast‐B soft liner attached to different acrylic surfaces (smooth, rough, and Sticktech net fiber‐reinforced interfaces) after 3000 thermal cycles.
Materials and Methods: Sixty‐nine specimens were fabricated by attaching Molloplast‐B soft liner to acrylic bases of three interfaces (n= 23); smooth (Group 1, control), rough (Group 2), and Sticktech net fiber‐reinforced interface (Group 3). The specimens underwent 3000 thermocycles (5 and 55°C) before being subject to a shear bond test at 2 mm/min crosshead speed. Debonding sites were investigated using an optical microscope at 40× magnification. Bond failures were categorized as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed.
Results: Mean (SD) bond strength values (MPa) were: 0.71 (0.15); 0.63 (0.07); and 0.83 (0.12) for smooth, rough, and fiber‐reinforced acrylic interfaces, respectively. The mean values were analyzed using one‐way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test for pairwise comparisons (p≤ 0.05). The net fiber‐reinforced acrylic interface exhibited a statistically significantly higher bond strength value when compared to smooth and rough acrylic interfaces (P= 0.003 and P= 0.000, respectively). Modes of failure were mainly cohesive (91%), followed by mixed failures (9%).
Conclusions: Molloplast‐B exhibited a stronger bond to StickTech Net fiber‐reinforced surfaces when compared to smooth and rough acrylic interfaces after thermocycling. This may enhance prosthesis serviceability during clinical use. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Purpose: To evaluate shear bond strength of Molloplast‐B soft liner attached to different acrylic surfaces (smooth, rough, and Sticktech net fiber‐reinforced interfaces) after 3000 thermal cycles.
Materials and Methods: Sixty‐nine specimens were fabricated by attaching Molloplast‐B soft liner to acrylic bases of three interfaces (n= 23); smooth (Group 1, control), rough (Group 2), and Sticktech net fiber‐reinforced interface (Group 3). The specimens underwent 3000 thermocycles (5 and 55°C) before being subject to a shear bond test at 2 mm/min crosshead speed. Debonding sites were investigated using an optical microscope at 40× magnification. Bond failures were categorized as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed.
Results: Mean (SD) bond strength values (MPa) were: 0.71 (0.15); 0.63 (0.07); and 0.83 (0.12) for smooth, rough, and fiber‐reinforced acrylic interfaces, respectively. The mean values were analyzed using one‐way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test for pairwise comparisons (p≤ 0.05). The net fiber‐reinforced acrylic interface exhibited a statistically significantly higher bond strength value when compared to smooth and rough acrylic interfaces (P= 0.003 and P= 0.000, respectively). Modes of failure were mainly cohesive (91%), followed by mixed failures (9%).
Conclusions: Molloplast‐B exhibited a stronger bond to StickTech Net fiber‐reinforced surfaces when compared to smooth and rough acrylic interfaces after thermocycling. This may enhance prosthesis serviceability during clinical use. To evaluate shear bond strength of Molloplast-B soft liner attached to different acrylic surfaces (smooth, rough, and Sticktech net fiber-reinforced interfaces) after 3000 thermal cycles.PURPOSETo evaluate shear bond strength of Molloplast-B soft liner attached to different acrylic surfaces (smooth, rough, and Sticktech net fiber-reinforced interfaces) after 3000 thermal cycles.Sixty-nine specimens were fabricated by attaching Molloplast-B soft liner to acrylic bases of three interfaces (n= 23); smooth (Group 1, control), rough (Group 2), and Sticktech net fiber-reinforced interface (Group 3). The specimens underwent 3000 thermocycles (5 and 55 degrees C) before being subject to a shear bond test at 2 mm/min crosshead speed. Debonding sites were investigated using an optical microscope at 40x magnification. Bond failures were categorized as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed.MATERIALS AND METHODSSixty-nine specimens were fabricated by attaching Molloplast-B soft liner to acrylic bases of three interfaces (n= 23); smooth (Group 1, control), rough (Group 2), and Sticktech net fiber-reinforced interface (Group 3). The specimens underwent 3000 thermocycles (5 and 55 degrees C) before being subject to a shear bond test at 2 mm/min crosshead speed. Debonding sites were investigated using an optical microscope at 40x magnification. Bond failures were categorized as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed.Mean (SD) bond strength values (MPa) were: 0.71 (0.15); 0.63 (0.07); and 0.83 (0.12) for smooth, rough, and fiber-reinforced acrylic interfaces, respectively. The mean values were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test for pairwise comparisons (p< or = 0.05). The net fiber-reinforced acrylic interface exhibited a statistically significantly higher bond strength value when compared to smooth and rough acrylic interfaces (P= 0.003 and P= 0.000, respectively). Modes of failure were mainly cohesive (91%), followed by mixed failures (9%).RESULTSMean (SD) bond strength values (MPa) were: 0.71 (0.15); 0.63 (0.07); and 0.83 (0.12) for smooth, rough, and fiber-reinforced acrylic interfaces, respectively. The mean values were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test for pairwise comparisons (p< or = 0.05). The net fiber-reinforced acrylic interface exhibited a statistically significantly higher bond strength value when compared to smooth and rough acrylic interfaces (P= 0.003 and P= 0.000, respectively). Modes of failure were mainly cohesive (91%), followed by mixed failures (9%).Molloplast-B exhibited a stronger bond to StickTech Net fiber-reinforced surfaces when compared to smooth and rough acrylic interfaces after thermocycling. This may enhance prosthesis serviceability during clinical use.CONCLUSIONSMolloplast-B exhibited a stronger bond to StickTech Net fiber-reinforced surfaces when compared to smooth and rough acrylic interfaces after thermocycling. This may enhance prosthesis serviceability during clinical use. To evaluate shear bond strength of Molloplast-B soft liner attached to different acrylic surfaces (smooth, rough, and Sticktech net fiber-reinforced interfaces) after 3000 thermal cycles. Sixty-nine specimens were fabricated by attaching Molloplast-B soft liner to acrylic bases of three interfaces (n= 23); smooth (Group 1, control), rough (Group 2), and Sticktech net fiber-reinforced interface (Group 3). The specimens underwent 3000 thermocycles (5 and 55 degrees C) before being subject to a shear bond test at 2 mm/min crosshead speed. Debonding sites were investigated using an optical microscope at 40x magnification. Bond failures were categorized as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed. Mean (SD) bond strength values (MPa) were: 0.71 (0.15); 0.63 (0.07); and 0.83 (0.12) for smooth, rough, and fiber-reinforced acrylic interfaces, respectively. The mean values were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test for pairwise comparisons (p< or = 0.05). The net fiber-reinforced acrylic interface exhibited a statistically significantly higher bond strength value when compared to smooth and rough acrylic interfaces (P= 0.003 and P= 0.000, respectively). Modes of failure were mainly cohesive (91%), followed by mixed failures (9%). Molloplast-B exhibited a stronger bond to StickTech Net fiber-reinforced surfaces when compared to smooth and rough acrylic interfaces after thermocycling. This may enhance prosthesis serviceability during clinical use. Purpose: To evaluate shear bond strength of Molloplast‐B soft liner attached to different acrylic surfaces (smooth, rough, and Sticktech net fiber‐reinforced interfaces) after 3000 thermal cycles. Materials and Methods: Sixty‐nine specimens were fabricated by attaching Molloplast‐B soft liner to acrylic bases of three interfaces ( n = 23); smooth (Group 1, control), rough (Group 2), and Sticktech net fiber‐reinforced interface (Group 3). The specimens underwent 3000 thermocycles (5 and 55°C) before being subject to a shear bond test at 2 mm/min crosshead speed. Debonding sites were investigated using an optical microscope at 40× magnification. Bond failures were categorized as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed. Results: Mean (SD) bond strength values (MPa) were: 0.71 (0.15); 0.63 (0.07); and 0.83 (0.12) for smooth, rough, and fiber‐reinforced acrylic interfaces, respectively. The mean values were analyzed using one‐way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test for pairwise comparisons ( p ≤ 0.05). The net fiber‐reinforced acrylic interface exhibited a statistically significantly higher bond strength value when compared to smooth and rough acrylic interfaces ( P = 0.003 and P = 0.000, respectively). Modes of failure were mainly cohesive (91%), followed by mixed failures (9%). Conclusions: Molloplast‐B exhibited a stronger bond to StickTech Net fiber‐reinforced surfaces when compared to smooth and rough acrylic interfaces after thermocycling. This may enhance prosthesis serviceability during clinical use. |
| Author | Silikas, Nick Hatamleh, Muhanad M. Maryan, Christopher J. Watts, David C. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Muhanad M. surname: Hatamleh fullname: Hatamleh, Muhanad M. organization: School of Dentistry/Biomaterials Science Research Group, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK – sequence: 2 givenname: Christopher J. surname: Maryan fullname: Maryan, Christopher J. organization: Centre for Dental Technology Studies, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK – sequence: 3 givenname: Nick surname: Silikas fullname: Silikas, Nick organization: School of Dentistry/Biomaterials Science Research Group, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK – sequence: 4 givenname: David C. surname: Watts fullname: Watts, David C. organization: School of Dentistry/Biomaterials Science Research Group, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20210862$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqNkU1v3CAQhlGVqvlo_kLErSe7YBtsH1qp2iZpm1US5fuGMB4qtl5IAbe7_754N8mhp3BhhnmfGfHOPtqxzgJCmJKcpvNxkVNWFllTtQ95QUibE8I4z1dv0N5LYSfFhLVZW9GHXbQfwoIQSllD36HdghSUNLzYQ_JYa1ARO43PIeIT04HHV2Csdl7BEmzE16PXUgG-8SDj5sVZfO10xF9TMnrAc2M3VEy5SUVpezx39if8MXH9Hr3Vcghw-HQfoNuT45vZt2x-cfp99mWeqYpwnkFPalZB1bOq1HXFir7pCl03kqmyBV52TOm-07RjrWJ9AUrXGiroNGF9RySUB-jDtu-jd79HCFEsTVAwDNKCG4Ooy7Jtk000KY-elGO3hF48erOUfi2eXUmCz1uB8i4ED1ooE-X0teilGQQlYlqDWIjJbTG5LaY1iM0axCo1aP5r8DzjFeinLfrXDLB-NSd-XFxepSjx2ZY3IcLqhZf-l-B1WTNxf34q7u_I7IxfcnFW_gOrzrA8 |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s10103_012_1082_7 crossref_primary_10_14368_jdras_2024_40_2_39 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12296 crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2014_6_2_121 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10103_010_0862_1 crossref_primary_10_3390_polym15183668 crossref_primary_10_1111_joor_12464 crossref_primary_10_1590_0103_6440201302118 crossref_primary_10_15407_fm30_04_549 crossref_primary_10_29254_2077_4214_2019_1_1_148_225_232 crossref_primary_10_1080_00914037_2022_2029441 crossref_primary_10_1089_pho_2015_3933 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10103_010_0825_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2020_08_009 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12958 crossref_primary_10_3390_ma14123308 crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10024_1682 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/0022-3913(79)90330-5 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90563-2 10.4012/dmj.24.667 10.1016/0022-3913(86)90293-3 10.1016/0267-6605(92)90008-H 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.005 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90292-8 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90010-4 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90014-1 10.1590/S1678-77572007000100005 10.1016/0300-5712(81)90007-5 10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00038-X 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00253-8 10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00946.x 10.1067/mpr.2002.128953 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.017 10.1080/00218460701196606 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.004 10.1067/mpr.2003.41 10.1111/j.1532-849X.1996.tb00511.x 10.1080/00016350510019667 10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.014 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90457-L 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00342.x 10.1002/jbm.b.30078 10.1590/S1678-77572006000600009 10.1007/978-3-642-60537-6 10.1016/0022-3913(84)90118-5 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2010 by The American College of Prosthodontists |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2010 by The American College of Prosthodontists |
| DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00566.x |
| DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE CrossRef |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Dentistry |
| EISSN | 1532-849X |
| EndPage | 262 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 20210862 10_1111_j_1532_849X_2009_00566_x JOPR566 ark_67375_WNG_WV0CK6P6_K |
| Genre | article Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29L 31~ 33P 34H 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFNX AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFZJQ AHBTC AHEFC AHMBA AIACR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 CWXXS D-E D-F DC6 DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM EBD EBS EJD F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC G-S G.N GODZA H.T H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES M41 MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2W P2X P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ TEORI UB1 W8V W99 WBKPD WBNRW WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WPGGZ WQJ WRC WXSBR XG1 ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AANHP AAYCA ACRPL ACYXJ ADNMO AFWVQ ALVPJ AAYXX AEYWJ AGHNM AGQPQ AGYGG CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4066-ed0754e4d543f7452d8b2f78a5c39e63b5cfdbf1b59c5d2ecf7fe4ebf05db0ae3 |
| IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
| ISSN | 1059-941X 1532-849X |
| IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 00:31:34 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:04:09 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:01:20 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:08:16 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:54:15 EST 2025 Wed Oct 30 09:52:28 EDT 2024 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 4 |
| Language | English |
| License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4066-ed0754e4d543f7452d8b2f78a5c39e63b5cfdbf1b59c5d2ecf7fe4ebf05db0ae3 |
| Notes | ark:/67375/WNG-WV0CK6P6-K istex:0E75FB7FB26F6B9792239638CE3D732397E54D13 ArticleID:JOPR566 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 20210862 |
| PQID | 733990561 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 5 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_733990561 pubmed_primary_20210862 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1532_849X_2009_00566_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1532_849X_2009_00566_x wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1532_849X_2009_00566_x_JOPR566 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_WV0CK6P6_K |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2010-06 June 2010 2010-06-00 2010-Jun 20100601 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2010-06-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2010 text: 2010-06 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Malden, USA |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Malden, USA – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of prosthodontics |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Prosthodont |
| PublicationYear | 2010 |
| Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Inc |
| References | Jagger D: Complete Dentures: Problem Solving. London , British Dental Association, 1999, pp. 39-42 McCabe JF, Carrick TE, Kamohara H: Adhesive bond strength and compliance for denture soft lining materials. Biomaterials 2002;23:1347-1352 Shernoff AF, Battle LW, Jarosz CJ: An alternative to conventional overdenture attachments with Molloplast-B: a technique. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:305-307 Craig RG, Powers JM, Wataha JC: Dental Materials: Properties and Manipulation Mosby , St Louis, 2004, pp. 284-287 Botega DM, Snahcez JLL, Mesquita MF, et al: Effects of thermocycling on the tesnile bond strength of three permanent soft denture liners. J Prosthodont 2008;17:550-554 Pinto JR, Mesquita MF, Henriques GE, et al: Effect of thermocycling on bond strength and elasticity of 4 long-term soft denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:516-521 Sarac YS, Basoglu T, Ceylan GK, et al: Effect of denture base surface pretreatment on microleakage of a silicone-based resilient liner. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:283-287 Elias CN, Henriques FQ: Effect of thermocycling on the tensile and shear bond strengths of three soft liners to denture base resin. J Appl Oral Sci 2007;15:18-23 Taft RM, Cameron SM, Knudson RC, et al: The effect of primers and surface characteristics on the adhesion-in-peel force of silicone elastomers bonded to resin materials. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:515-518. Al-Athel MS, Jagger RG: Effect of test method on the bond strength of a silicone resilient denture lining material. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:535-540 Pinto JR, Mesquita MF, Nobilo MA, et al: Evaluation of varying amounts of thermal cycling on bond strength and permanent deformation of two resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:288-293 McMordie R, King GE: Evaluation of primers used for bonding silicone to denture base material. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:636-639 Hatamleh MM, Watts DC: Fiber reinforcement enhances bonding of soft Lining to acrylic dental and maxillofacial prostheses. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2008;16:116-121 Soh G, Selwyn MJ: An evaluation of exposure time and temperature in the thermocycling of dental restorative materials. Clin Mater 1992;9:37-41 Fujii K, Minami H, Arikawa H, et al: Mechanical properties and bond strength of silicone-based resilient denture liners. Dent Mater J 2005;24:667-675 Neppelenbroek KH, Pavarina AC, Gomes MN, et al: Bond strength of hard chairside reline resins to a rapid polymerizing denture base resin before and after thermal cycling. J Appl Oral Sci 2006;14:436-442 Aydin AK, Terzioglu H, Akinay AE, et al: Bond strength and failure analysis of lining materials to denture resin. Dent Mater 1999;15:211-218 Murray CG: A resilient lining material for the retention of maxillofacial prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:53-57 Adrian ED, Krantz WA, Ivanhoe JR: The use of processed silicone to retain the implant-supported tissue-borne overdenture. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:219-222 Braden M, Parker S (eds): Polymeric Dental Materials. London , Springer; 1997, pp. 104-122 Kulak-Ozkan Y, Sertgoz A, Gedik H: Effect of thermocycling on tensile bond strength of six silicone-based, resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:303-310 Mese A, Guzel KG, Uysal E: Effect of storage duration on tensile bond strength of acrylic or silicone-based soft denture liners to a processed denture base polymer. Acta Odontol Scand 2005;63:31-35 Dogăn OM, Keskin S, Bolayir G, et al: Flexural and bonding properties of a denture base polymer treated with nitric acid or ultraviolet radiation before relining with molloplast-B. J Adhesion 2007;83:129-137 Schmidt WF, Todo J, Bolender CL: Laboratory management of Molloplast-B-lined dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:113-118 Al-Athel M, Jagger R, Jagger D: Effect of ageing on the bond strength of a permanent denture soft lining material. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:992-996 Machado AL, Breeding LC, Puckett AD: Effect of microwave disinfection on the hardness and adhesion of two resilient liners. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:183-189 Cain JR, Mitchell DL: Soft liner-retained, implant-supported overdenture: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:857-860 Mutluay MM, Ruyter IE: Evaluation of bond strength of soft relining materials to denture base polymers. Dent Mater 2007;23:1373-1381 Gale MS, Darvell BW: Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89-99 Braden M, Wright PS, Parker S: Soft lining materials-a review. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent 1995;3:163-174 Vallittu PK: A review of fiber-reinforced denture base resins. J Prosthodont 1996;5:270-276 Schmidt WF, Smith DE: A six-year retrospective study of Molloplast-B-lined dentures. Part II. Liner serviceability. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:459-465 Jagger RG, Al-Athel MS, Jagger DC, et al: Some variables influencing the bond strength between PMMA and a silicone denture lining material. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:55-58 Kutay O, Bilgin T, Sakar O, et al: Tensile bond strength of a soft lining with acrylic denture base resins. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1994;2:123-126 Usumez A, Inan O, Aykent F: Bond strength of a silicone lining material to alumina-abraded and lased denture resin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;71:196-200 Takashi Y: Assessment of shear bond strength between three denture reline materials and a denture Base Acrylic Resin. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:531-535 Elias CN, Henriques FQ: Effect of thermocycling on the tensile and shear bond strengths of three soft liners to a denture base resin. J Appl Oral Sci 2007;15:18-23 Amin WM, Fletcher AM, Richie GM: The nature of the interface between polyethyl methacrylate denture base materials and soft lining materials. Dent Mater 1981;9:336-346 2002; 15 1989; 61 1986; 56 1999; 27 2008; 16 2006; 14 2008; 17 2005; 63 1997 1981; 9 1994 1983; 50 2004 1995; 3 1996; 76 2007; 15 2005; 24 1999 1984; 52 1992; 9 2004; 92 2002; 29 2004; 71 2002; 23 1999; 15 2002; 88 2007; 83 2005; 94 1979; 42 1996; 5 1992; 67 2001; 14 1994; 2 2007; 23 1998; 13 2003; 89 Hatamleh MM (e_1_2_6_19_2) 2008; 16 e_1_2_6_31_2 e_1_2_6_30_2 Cain JR (e_1_2_6_7_2) 1998; 13 Kutay O (e_1_2_6_17_2) 1994; 2 Takashi Y (e_1_2_6_14_2) 2001; 14 e_1_2_6_18_2 e_1_2_6_12_2 e_1_2_6_35_2 e_1_2_6_13_2 e_1_2_6_34_2 e_1_2_6_10_2 e_1_2_6_33_2 e_1_2_6_11_2 e_1_2_6_32_2 e_1_2_6_39_2 Braden M (e_1_2_6_2_2) 1995; 3 Jagger RG (e_1_2_6_16_2) 2002; 15 e_1_2_6_38_2 e_1_2_6_15_2 e_1_2_6_36_2 Jagger D (e_1_2_6_27_2) 1999 e_1_2_6_20_2 e_1_2_6_40_2 e_1_2_6_8_2 Craig RG (e_1_2_6_37_2) 2004 e_1_2_6_9_2 e_1_2_6_29_2 e_1_2_6_4_2 e_1_2_6_3_2 e_1_2_6_6_2 e_1_2_6_5_2 e_1_2_6_24_2 e_1_2_6_23_2 e_1_2_6_22_2 e_1_2_6_21_2 e_1_2_6_28_2 e_1_2_6_26_2 e_1_2_6_25_2 |
| References_xml | – reference: Neppelenbroek KH, Pavarina AC, Gomes MN, et al: Bond strength of hard chairside reline resins to a rapid polymerizing denture base resin before and after thermal cycling. J Appl Oral Sci 2006;14:436-442 – reference: Mutluay MM, Ruyter IE: Evaluation of bond strength of soft relining materials to denture base polymers. Dent Mater 2007;23:1373-1381 – reference: Takashi Y: Assessment of shear bond strength between three denture reline materials and a denture Base Acrylic Resin. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:531-535 – reference: Usumez A, Inan O, Aykent F: Bond strength of a silicone lining material to alumina-abraded and lased denture resin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;71:196-200 – reference: Craig RG, Powers JM, Wataha JC: Dental Materials: Properties and Manipulation Mosby , St Louis, 2004, pp. 284-287 – reference: Braden M, Wright PS, Parker S: Soft lining materials-a review. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent 1995;3:163-174 – reference: Vallittu PK: A review of fiber-reinforced denture base resins. J Prosthodont 1996;5:270-276 – reference: Botega DM, Snahcez JLL, Mesquita MF, et al: Effects of thermocycling on the tesnile bond strength of three permanent soft denture liners. J Prosthodont 2008;17:550-554 – reference: McMordie R, King GE: Evaluation of primers used for bonding silicone to denture base material. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:636-639 – reference: Schmidt WF, Smith DE: A six-year retrospective study of Molloplast-B-lined dentures. Part II. Liner serviceability. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:459-465 – reference: Fujii K, Minami H, Arikawa H, et al: Mechanical properties and bond strength of silicone-based resilient denture liners. Dent Mater J 2005;24:667-675 – reference: Pinto JR, Mesquita MF, Henriques GE, et al: Effect of thermocycling on bond strength and elasticity of 4 long-term soft denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:516-521 – reference: Shernoff AF, Battle LW, Jarosz CJ: An alternative to conventional overdenture attachments with Molloplast-B: a technique. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:305-307 – reference: Amin WM, Fletcher AM, Richie GM: The nature of the interface between polyethyl methacrylate denture base materials and soft lining materials. Dent Mater 1981;9:336-346 – reference: Jagger D: Complete Dentures: Problem Solving. London , British Dental Association, 1999, pp. 39-42 – reference: Pinto JR, Mesquita MF, Nobilo MA, et al: Evaluation of varying amounts of thermal cycling on bond strength and permanent deformation of two resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:288-293 – reference: Mese A, Guzel KG, Uysal E: Effect of storage duration on tensile bond strength of acrylic or silicone-based soft denture liners to a processed denture base polymer. Acta Odontol Scand 2005;63:31-35 – reference: Dogăn OM, Keskin S, Bolayir G, et al: Flexural and bonding properties of a denture base polymer treated with nitric acid or ultraviolet radiation before relining with molloplast-B. J Adhesion 2007;83:129-137 – reference: McCabe JF, Carrick TE, Kamohara H: Adhesive bond strength and compliance for denture soft lining materials. Biomaterials 2002;23:1347-1352 – reference: Adrian ED, Krantz WA, Ivanhoe JR: The use of processed silicone to retain the implant-supported tissue-borne overdenture. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:219-222 – reference: Braden M, Parker S (eds): Polymeric Dental Materials. London , Springer; 1997, pp. 104-122 – reference: Kutay O, Bilgin T, Sakar O, et al: Tensile bond strength of a soft lining with acrylic denture base resins. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1994;2:123-126 – reference: Sarac YS, Basoglu T, Ceylan GK, et al: Effect of denture base surface pretreatment on microleakage of a silicone-based resilient liner. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:283-287 – reference: Elias CN, Henriques FQ: Effect of thermocycling on the tensile and shear bond strengths of three soft liners to a denture base resin. J Appl Oral Sci 2007;15:18-23 – reference: Aydin AK, Terzioglu H, Akinay AE, et al: Bond strength and failure analysis of lining materials to denture resin. Dent Mater 1999;15:211-218 – reference: Murray CG: A resilient lining material for the retention of maxillofacial prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:53-57 – reference: Jagger RG, Al-Athel MS, Jagger DC, et al: Some variables influencing the bond strength between PMMA and a silicone denture lining material. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:55-58 – reference: Al-Athel MS, Jagger RG: Effect of test method on the bond strength of a silicone resilient denture lining material. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:535-540 – reference: Al-Athel M, Jagger R, Jagger D: Effect of ageing on the bond strength of a permanent denture soft lining material. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:992-996 – reference: Schmidt WF, Todo J, Bolender CL: Laboratory management of Molloplast-B-lined dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:113-118 – reference: Soh G, Selwyn MJ: An evaluation of exposure time and temperature in the thermocycling of dental restorative materials. Clin Mater 1992;9:37-41 – reference: Cain JR, Mitchell DL: Soft liner-retained, implant-supported overdenture: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:857-860 – reference: Gale MS, Darvell BW: Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89-99 – reference: Machado AL, Breeding LC, Puckett AD: Effect of microwave disinfection on the hardness and adhesion of two resilient liners. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:183-189 – reference: Hatamleh MM, Watts DC: Fiber reinforcement enhances bonding of soft Lining to acrylic dental and maxillofacial prostheses. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2008;16:116-121 – reference: Kulak-Ozkan Y, Sertgoz A, Gedik H: Effect of thermocycling on tensile bond strength of six silicone-based, resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:303-310 – reference: Taft RM, Cameron SM, Knudson RC, et al: The effect of primers and surface characteristics on the adhesion-in-peel force of silicone elastomers bonded to resin materials. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:515-518. – reference: Elias CN, Henriques FQ: Effect of thermocycling on the tensile and shear bond strengths of three soft liners to denture base resin. J Appl Oral Sci 2007;15:18-23 – volume: 3 start-page: 163 year: 1995 end-page: 174 article-title: Soft lining materials—a review publication-title: Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent – volume: 88 start-page: 516 year: 2002 end-page: 521 article-title: Effect of thermocycling on bond strength and elasticity of 4 long‐term soft denture liners publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 9 start-page: 336 year: 1981 end-page: 346 article-title: The nature of the interface between polyethyl methacrylate denture base materials and soft lining materials publication-title: Dent Mater – start-page: 284 year: 2004 end-page: 287 – volume: 24 start-page: 667 year: 2005 end-page: 675 article-title: Mechanical properties and bond strength of silicone‐based resilient denture liners publication-title: Dent Mater J – volume: 15 start-page: 18 year: 2007 end-page: 23 article-title: Effect of thermocycling on the tensile and shear bond strengths of three soft liners to denture base resin publication-title: J Appl Oral Sci – volume: 71 start-page: 196 year: 2004 end-page: 200 article-title: Bond strength of a silicone lining material to alumina‐abraded and lased denture resin publication-title: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater – volume: 92 start-page: 283 year: 2004 end-page: 287 article-title: Effect of denture base surface pretreatment on microleakage of a silicone‐based resilient liner publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 15 start-page: 18 year: 2007 end-page: 23 article-title: Effect of thermocycling on the tensile and shear bond strengths of three soft liners to a denture base resin publication-title: J Appl Oral Sci – volume: 15 start-page: 55 year: 2002 end-page: 58 article-title: Some variables influencing the bond strength between PMMA and a silicone denture lining material publication-title: Int J Prosthodont – volume: 2 start-page: 123 year: 1994 end-page: 126 article-title: Tensile bond strength of a soft lining with acrylic denture base resins publication-title: Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent – volume: 15 start-page: 211 year: 1999 end-page: 218 article-title: Bond strength and failure analysis of lining materials to denture resin publication-title: Dent Mater – volume: 23 start-page: 1373 year: 2007 end-page: 1381 article-title: Evaluation of bond strength of soft relining materials to denture base polymers publication-title: Dent Mater – volume: 13 start-page: 857 year: 1998 end-page: 860 article-title: Soft liner‐retained, implant‐supported overdenture: a technical note publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants – volume: 94 start-page: 183 year: 2005 end-page: 189 article-title: Effect of microwave disinfection on the hardness and adhesion of two resilient liners publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 14 start-page: 436 year: 2006 end-page: 442 article-title: Bond strength of hard chairside reline resins to a rapid polymerizing denture base resin before and after thermal cycling publication-title: J Appl Oral Sci – start-page: 104 year: 1997 end-page: 122 – volume: 50 start-page: 459 year: 1983 end-page: 465 article-title: A six‐year retrospective study of Molloplast‐B‐lined dentures. Part II. Liner serviceability publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 89 start-page: 303 year: 2003 end-page: 310 article-title: Effect of thermocycling on tensile bond strength of six silicone‐based, resilient denture liners publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 27 start-page: 89 year: 1999 end-page: 99 article-title: Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations publication-title: J Dent – year: 1994 – volume: 14 start-page: 531 year: 2001 end-page: 535 article-title: Assessment of shear bond strength between three denture reline materials and a denture Base Acrylic Resin publication-title: Int J Prosthodont – volume: 16 start-page: 116 year: 2008 end-page: 121 article-title: Fiber reinforcement enhances bonding of soft Lining to acrylic dental and maxillofacial prostheses publication-title: Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent – volume: 52 start-page: 305 year: 1984 end-page: 307 article-title: An alternative to conventional overdenture attachments with Molloplast‐B: a technique publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 5 start-page: 270 year: 1996 end-page: 276 article-title: A review of fiber‐reinforced denture base resins publication-title: J Prosthodont – volume: 42 start-page: 53 year: 1979 end-page: 57 article-title: A resilient lining material for the retention of maxillofacial prostheses publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 63 start-page: 31 year: 2005 end-page: 35 article-title: Effect of storage duration on tensile bond strength of acrylic or silicone‐based soft denture liners to a processed denture base polymer publication-title: Acta Odontol Scand – volume: 67 start-page: 219 year: 1992 end-page: 222 article-title: The use of processed silicone to retain the implant‐supported tissue‐borne overdenture publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 61 start-page: 636 year: 1989 end-page: 639 article-title: Evaluation of primers used for bonding silicone to denture base material publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 76 start-page: 535 year: 1996 end-page: 540 article-title: Effect of test method on the bond strength of a silicone resilient denture lining material publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 92 start-page: 288 year: 2004 end-page: 293 article-title: Evaluation of varying amounts of thermal cycling on bond strength and permanent deformation of two resilient denture liners publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 23 start-page: 1347 year: 2002 end-page: 1352 article-title: Adhesive bond strength and compliance for denture soft lining materials publication-title: Biomaterials – volume: 17 start-page: 550 year: 2008 end-page: 554 article-title: Effects of thermocycling on the tesnile bond strength of three permanent soft denture liners publication-title: J Prosthodont – volume: 83 start-page: 129 year: 2007 end-page: 137 article-title: Flexural and bonding properties of a denture base polymer treated with nitric acid or ultraviolet radiation before relining with molloplast‐B publication-title: J Adhesion – volume: 76 start-page: 515 year: 1996 end-page: 518 article-title: The effect of primers and surface characteristics on the adhesion‐in‐peel force of silicone elastomers bonded to resin materials publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – start-page: 39 year: 1999 end-page: 42 – volume: 29 start-page: 992 year: 2002 end-page: 996 article-title: Effect of ageing on the bond strength of a permanent denture soft lining material publication-title: J Oral Rehabil – volume: 56 start-page: 113 year: 1986 end-page: 118 article-title: Laboratory management of Molloplast‐B‐lined dentures publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 9 start-page: 37 year: 1992 end-page: 41 article-title: An evaluation of exposure time and temperature in the thermocycling of dental restorative materials publication-title: Clin Mater – ident: e_1_2_6_9_2 doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(79)90330-5 – ident: e_1_2_6_26_2 doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90563-2 – ident: e_1_2_6_31_2 doi: 10.4012/dmj.24.667 – ident: e_1_2_6_28_2 doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(86)90293-3 – ident: e_1_2_6_30_2 doi: 10.1016/0267-6605(92)90008-H – volume: 2 start-page: 123 year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_6_17_2 article-title: Tensile bond strength of a soft lining with acrylic denture base resins publication-title: Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent – ident: e_1_2_6_38_2 doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.005 – ident: e_1_2_6_18_2 doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90292-8 – ident: e_1_2_6_23_2 doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90010-4 – ident: e_1_2_6_25_2 doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90014-1 – ident: e_1_2_6_32_2 doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572007000100005 – ident: e_1_2_6_12_2 doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572007000100005 – ident: e_1_2_6_21_2 doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(81)90007-5 – start-page: 39 volume-title: Complete Dentures: Problem Solving year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_6_27_2 – volume: 3 start-page: 163 year: 1995 ident: e_1_2_6_2_2 article-title: Soft lining materials—a review publication-title: Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent – ident: e_1_2_6_5_2 doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00038-X – ident: e_1_2_6_4_2 doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00253-8 – ident: e_1_2_6_29_2 doi: 10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2 – ident: e_1_2_6_33_2 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00946.x – ident: e_1_2_6_40_2 doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.128953 – ident: e_1_2_6_10_2 doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.017 – volume: 14 start-page: 531 year: 2001 ident: e_1_2_6_14_2 article-title: Assessment of shear bond strength between three denture reline materials and a denture Base Acrylic Resin publication-title: Int J Prosthodont – ident: e_1_2_6_15_2 doi: 10.1080/00218460701196606 – volume: 13 start-page: 857 year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_6_7_2 article-title: Soft liner‐retained, implant‐supported overdenture: a technical note publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants – volume: 16 start-page: 116 year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_6_19_2 article-title: Fiber reinforcement enhances bonding of soft Lining to acrylic dental and maxillofacial prostheses publication-title: Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent – ident: e_1_2_6_3_2 doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.004 – ident: e_1_2_6_34_2 doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.41 – ident: e_1_2_6_36_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.1996.tb00511.x – ident: e_1_2_6_11_2 doi: 10.1080/00016350510019667 – ident: e_1_2_6_22_2 doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.014 – ident: e_1_2_6_6_2 doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90457-L – ident: e_1_2_6_20_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00342.x – ident: e_1_2_6_13_2 doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30078 – ident: e_1_2_6_35_2 doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572006000600009 – ident: e_1_2_6_39_2 – ident: e_1_2_6_24_2 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-60537-6 – ident: e_1_2_6_8_2 doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(84)90118-5 – volume: 15 start-page: 55 year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_6_16_2 article-title: Some variables influencing the bond strength between PMMA and a silicone denture lining material publication-title: Int J Prosthodont – start-page: 284 volume-title: Dental Materials: Properties and Manipulation year: 2004 ident: e_1_2_6_37_2 |
| SSID | ssj0011581 |
| Score | 1.9442394 |
| Snippet | Purpose: To evaluate shear bond strength of Molloplast‐B soft liner attached to different acrylic surfaces (smooth, rough, and Sticktech net fiber‐reinforced... Purpose: To evaluate shear bond strength of Molloplast‐B soft liner attached to different acrylic surfaces (smooth, rough, and Sticktech net fiber‐reinforced... To evaluate shear bond strength of Molloplast-B soft liner attached to different acrylic surfaces (smooth, rough, and Sticktech net fiber-reinforced... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley istex |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 258 |
| SubjectTerms | Acrylic Resins Analysis of Variance Dental Bonding Dental Stress Analysis Denture Liners Dimethylpolysiloxanes Glass glass fiber Humans Materials Testing Molloplast-B Shear Strength Shear test Silicone Elastomers soft liner Statistics, Nonparametric Surface Properties thermocycling |
| Title | Effect of Net Fiber Reinforcement Surface Treatment on Soft Denture Liner Retention and Longevity |
| URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-WV0CK6P6-K/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1532-849X.2009.00566.x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20210862 https://www.proquest.com/docview/733990561 |
| Volume | 19 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV07b9swECaKZGiXvh9q04JD0U2GJZGSORZJ3CAJ3MBJGm8EH8cMLqTCkYGgv753lCXERYag6CJoOUKi7njfUR-_Y-yz9U76wmQpOBVSgctwajArpE5lgHigmgQf1T5n5dGlOF7IxYb_RGdhOn2IYcONIiOu1xTgxt5sB7ksMJqFWvSykwhNRoQnibpF-Gg-KEkh7on9SglNpEpki21Sz70DbWWqXZr02_tg6DaqjWlp-owt-xfq2CjL0bq1I_f7L63H__PGz9nTDXrlXzt3e8EeQf2SPT4gxhE1jXvFTKeGzJvAZ9DyKfFR-ByiPKuLO5H8fL0KxgG_6CnuvKn5OWYDfhATIPBTOpCIVm1HxeSm9vy0qa-B-ly8ZpfTw4v9o3TTxSF1CBbKFDyiEgHCS1GESsjcT2weqomRrlBQFla64G3IrFToNjm4UAUQYMNYejs2ULxhO3VTwzvGwVhcoGypZCiFAjExAa95qYwx4DObsKr_YtptJM6p08ZPfafUwSnUNIXUgFPpOIX6NmHZYPmrk_l4gM2X6BSDgVktiSZXSX01-6avfoz3T8qzUp8kjPdeozF46Y-MqaFZ3-iqQHxINVzC3nbeNAyWUzGO5WbCyugTD34sffz9bI537__V8AN70lEkaKtpj-20qzV8ROTV2k8xpv4Am9Qgpg |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9swDBaG9tBd9n64e-kw7OYgtiU7Pg7tsqzJsiJN19wEPagdWthD6gDFfv1IOTaWoYdi2MXwhYJNk-JHmvrI2HvjrHSZTmKwpY8FbsOxxqgQ2zIBxAPFyLvA9jnPJ-fiZCVX23FAdBam5YfoC27kGWG_JgengvSul8sM3VmUq453ErHJAAHlPg34DvnVoueSQuQTJpYSnohLkax223puXWknVu2T2m9uA6K7uDYEpvFDdtW9UtuPcjnYNGZgf_3F9vif3vkRe7AFsPxja3GP2T2onrCDY2o6orlxT5luCZF57fkcGj6mlhS-gMDQakMxkp9t1l5b4Muuy53XFT_DgMCPQwwEPqMziSjVtN2YXFeOz-rqB9Coi2fsfPxpeTSJt4McYot4IY_BITARIJwUmS-ETN3IpL4YaWmzEvLMSOud8YmRJVpOCtYXHgQYP5TODDVkz9leVVfwknHQBvcok5fS56IEMdIer2leaq3BJSZiRffJlN2ynNOwjSv1R7aDKlSkQprBWaqgQnUTsaSX_NkyfdxB5kOwil5Ary-pU66Q6mL-WV18Hx5N89NcTSPGO7NR6L_0U0ZXUG-uVZEhRKQ0LmIvWnPqF0spH8eMM2J5MIo7P5Y6-Xa6wLvDfxV8xw4my68zNfsyn75i99uOCao8vWZ7zXoDbxCINeZtcLDfpPIkwQ |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwELbQrgRceLOEpw-IW6omsZ34iLaUZVuVqrvL9mb5MeZQlK5KKq349YydJqJoDyvEJcplrMSZ8XzjfP6GkPfGWe4KnaVgpU8ZLsOpxqyQWpkB4oGy8i6qfc7EyQU7XfLljv8UzsK0-hD9hluIjLhehwC_cn4_yHmB0czkspOdRGgyQDx5yMSwCh4-WvRSUgh8YsPSACdSybLlPqvnxpH2UtVhmPXrm3DoPqyNeWn8kKy6N2rpKKvBtjED--svscf_88qPyIMdfKUfW397TO5A_YTcGwXKUega95ToVg6Zrj2dQUPHgZBCFxD1WW3ciqRn243XFuh5x3Gn65qeYTqgo5gBgU7DiUS0alouJtW1o9N1_R1Co4tn5GL86fz4JN21cUgtogWRgkNYwoA5zgpfMp67yuS-rDS3hQRRGG69Mz4zXKLf5GB96YGB8UPuzFBD8Zwc1OsaXhAK2uAKZYTkXjAJrNIer7mQWmtwmUlI2X0xZXca56HVxg_1R62DU6jCFIYOnFLFKVTXCcl6y6tW5-MWNh-iU_QGerMKPLmSq8vZZ3X5bXg8EXOhJgmhndcojN7wS0bXsN7-VGWBADEUcQk5ar2pHywP1TjWmwkR0Sdu_Vjq9Ot8gXcv_9XwHbk7H43V9Mts8orcb-kSYdvpNTloNlt4gyisMW9jeP0GKcIjeQ |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+Net+Fiber+Reinforcement+Surface+Treatment+on+Soft+Denture+Liner+Retention+and+Longevity&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+prosthodontics&rft.au=Hatamleh%2C+Muhanad+M.&rft.au=Maryan%2C+Christopher+J.&rft.au=Silikas%2C+Nick&rft.au=Watts%2C+David+C.&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Inc&rft.issn=1059-941X&rft.eissn=1532-849X&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=258&rft.epage=262&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1532-849X.2009.00566.x&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Fj.1532-849X.2009.00566.x&rft.externalDocID=JOPR566 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1059-941X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1059-941X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1059-941X&client=summon |