Effect of Net Fiber Reinforcement Surface Treatment on Soft Denture Liner Retention and Longevity

Purpose: To evaluate shear bond strength of Molloplast‐B soft liner attached to different acrylic surfaces (smooth, rough, and Sticktech net fiber‐reinforced interfaces) after 3000 thermal cycles. Materials and Methods: Sixty‐nine specimens were fabricated by attaching Molloplast‐B soft liner to acr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of prosthodontics Vol. 19; no. 4; pp. 258 - 262
Main Authors Hatamleh, Muhanad M., Maryan, Christopher J., Silikas, Nick, Watts, David C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.06.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose: To evaluate shear bond strength of Molloplast‐B soft liner attached to different acrylic surfaces (smooth, rough, and Sticktech net fiber‐reinforced interfaces) after 3000 thermal cycles. Materials and Methods: Sixty‐nine specimens were fabricated by attaching Molloplast‐B soft liner to acrylic bases of three interfaces (n= 23); smooth (Group 1, control), rough (Group 2), and Sticktech net fiber‐reinforced interface (Group 3). The specimens underwent 3000 thermocycles (5 and 55°C) before being subject to a shear bond test at 2 mm/min crosshead speed. Debonding sites were investigated using an optical microscope at 40× magnification. Bond failures were categorized as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed. Results: Mean (SD) bond strength values (MPa) were: 0.71 (0.15); 0.63 (0.07); and 0.83 (0.12) for smooth, rough, and fiber‐reinforced acrylic interfaces, respectively. The mean values were analyzed using one‐way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test for pairwise comparisons (p≤ 0.05). The net fiber‐reinforced acrylic interface exhibited a statistically significantly higher bond strength value when compared to smooth and rough acrylic interfaces (P= 0.003 and P= 0.000, respectively). Modes of failure were mainly cohesive (91%), followed by mixed failures (9%). Conclusions: Molloplast‐B exhibited a stronger bond to StickTech Net fiber‐reinforced surfaces when compared to smooth and rough acrylic interfaces after thermocycling. This may enhance prosthesis serviceability during clinical use.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-WV0CK6P6-K
istex:0E75FB7FB26F6B9792239638CE3D732397E54D13
ArticleID:JOPR566
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1059-941X
1532-849X
1532-849X
DOI:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00566.x