Dual Intragastric Balloon: Single Ambulatory Center Spanish Experience with 60 Patients in Endoscopic Weight Loss Management
Background Many obese patients fail conventional medical management and decline bariatric surgery. Less invasive weight loss options such as intragastric balloons may provide an opportunity to reach this large number of untreated patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and effe...
Saved in:
Published in | Obesity surgery Vol. 25; no. 12; pp. 2263 - 2267 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer US
01.12.2015
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Many obese patients fail conventional medical management and decline bariatric surgery. Less invasive weight loss options such as intragastric balloons may provide an opportunity to reach this large number of untreated patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the Dual Intragastric Balloon (DIGB) in the treatment of obese patients, as well as the impact of degree of obesity, age, and gender.
Methods
The study was conducted at the Bariatric Endoscopy Unit of the Madrid Sanchinarro University Hospital. Sixty patients (11 men, 49 women) underwent endoscopic placement of a DIGB filled with a total of 900 cc of saline (450 cc in each balloon) for at least 6 months, along with regular counseling from a multidisciplinary team. Study outcomes included: change in body weight (TBWL), % of loss of initial body weight (%TBWL), % of excess body weight loss (%EWL), and adverse events.
Results
Initial BMI 38.8 kg/m
2
decreased 6.1 units, with mean TBWL, %TBWL, and %EWL of 16.6 kg, 15.4 %, and 47.1 %, respectively. We found no difference in %TBWL between grade of obesity, age or sex, but morbidly obese patients demonstrated greater TBWL, and women and less obese subjects obtained higher %EWL. The DIGB was generally well tolerated, with one early removal for patient intolerance, one early deflation without migration, and one gastric perforation. Fourteen patients had small, clinically insignificant ulcers or erosions noted at the time of removal.
Conclusions
The present study shows that the DIGB was easy to use, resulted in significant weight loss, safe, and well tolerated. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0960-8923 1708-0428 1708-0428 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11695-015-1715-6 |