Autologous stem cell transplant in fit patients with refractory or early relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that responded to salvage chemotherapy

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is the new standard of care in fit patients with refractory or early relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, there may still be a role for salvage chemotherapy (ST) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in certain circumstances (e.g., la...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHaematologica (Roma) Vol. 109; no. 7; pp. 2186 - 2195
Main Authors Tun, Aung M, Wang, Yucai, Maliske, Seth, Micallef, Ivana, Inwards, David J, Habermann, Thomas M, Porrata, Luis, Paludo, Jonas, Bisneto, Jose Villasboas, Rosenthal, Allison, Kharfan-Dabaja, Mohamed A, Ansell, Stephen M, Nowakowski, Grzegorz S, Farooq, Umar, Johnston, Patrick B
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Italy Fondazione Ferrata Storti 01.07.2024
Ferrata Storti Foundation
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is the new standard of care in fit patients with refractory or early relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, there may still be a role for salvage chemotherapy (ST) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in certain circumstances (e.g., lack of resources for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, chemosensitive relapses). We retrospectively studied 230 patients with refractory or early relapsed DLBCL who underwent ST and ASCT. The median line of ST was one (range, 1-3). Best response before ASCT was complete response in 106 (46%) and partial response in 124 (54%) patients. The median follow-up after ASCT was 89.4 months. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16.1 and 43.3 months, respectively. Patients relapsing between 6 to 12 months after frontline therapy had a numerically better median PFS (29.6 months) and OS (88.5 months). Patients who required one line of ST, compared to those requiring more than one line, had a better median PFS (37.9 vs. 3.9 months; P=0.0005) and OS (68.3 vs. 12.0 months; P=0.0005). Patients who achieved complete response had a better median PFS (71.1 vs. 6.3 months; P<0.0001) and OS (110.3 vs. 18.9 months; P<0.0001) than those in partial response. Patients who achieved complete response after one line of ST had the most favorable median PFS (88.5 months) and OS (117.2 months). Post-ASCT survival outcomes of patients with refractory or early relapsed DLBCL appeared reasonable and were particularly favorable in those who required only one line of ST to achieve complete response before ASCT, highlighting the role of this procedure in select patients with chemosensitive disease.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Disclosures
Contributions
AMT, YW, and PBJ conceived and designed the study and prepared the first draft of the manuscript. AMT and SM collected and assembled data. All authors analyzed and interpreted data, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final version.
No conflicts of interest to disclose.
ISSN:0390-6078
1592-8721
1592-8721
DOI:10.3324/haematol.2023.284704