Research Ethics for Behavior Analysts in Practice

• Published in: Behavior analysis in practice Vol. 16; no. 1; pp. 13 - 22
• Main Authors: Normand, Matthew P., Donohue, Hailey E.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.03.2023; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Behavioral Science and Psychology; Discussion and Review Paper; Education; Graphs; Informed consent; Intervention; Medical research; Professions; Psychologists; Psychology; Research ethics; Researchers; conflict of interest; informed consent; ethics; clinical research; dual relationships
• ISSN: 1998-1929; 2196-8934
• DOI: 10.1007/s40617-022-00698-5

Behavior analysts in practice have an advantage over many others in the helping professions—they have at their disposal a robust science of behavior change informed primarily by single-case experimental research designs. This is advantageous because the research literature is focused on individual behavior change and has direct relevance to behavior analysts who need to change the behavior of individuals in need. Also, the same experimental designs used to advance the basic and applied sciences can be used to evaluate and refine specific procedures as they are put into practice. Thus, behavior-analytic research and practice are often intertwined. However, when behavior analysts in practice conduct research and use their own clients as participants, several important ethical issues need to be considered. Research with human participants is subject to careful ethical oversight, but the ethical guidelines that have been developed are usually described in terms of research conducted by nonpractitioners working in universities or institutions. This article focuses on several areas of special concern when conducting research in practice settings, including dual relationships and conflicts of interest, obtaining informed consent, and using ethical review panels.