Physico-chemical characteristics and fungal profile of four Saudi fresh date (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars

•Aspergillus sp. was the most dominant fungal genera in Saudi fresh date cultivars.•Lowest fungal occurrence and highest total phenolic content in Rothana cultivar.•Total sugar and fungal occurrence highest in Sukari and Barhi cultivars.•Mycotoxins not detected in any of the date cultivars during 14...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFood chemistry Vol. 221; pp. 644 - 649
Main Authors Al-Asmari, Fahad, Nirmal, Nilesh, Chaliha, Mridusmita, Williams, David, Mereddy, Ram, Shelat, Kinnari, Sultanbawa, Yasmina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 15.04.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Aspergillus sp. was the most dominant fungal genera in Saudi fresh date cultivars.•Lowest fungal occurrence and highest total phenolic content in Rothana cultivar.•Total sugar and fungal occurrence highest in Sukari and Barhi cultivars.•Mycotoxins not detected in any of the date cultivars during 14days of storage. Physico-chemical and microbial analyses of four commercial fresh date cultivars (Sukari, Barhi, Khalas and Rothana) grown in Saudi Arabia were evaluated. Colorimetric assay indicated that Sukari had the highest total sugar content of 13.21g/100gFW while the lowest was in Rothana with 7.96g/100gFW. Total phenolic content (TPC) ranged from 76.74 to 122.20mgGAE/100gFW in Barhi and Rothana respectively, whereas antioxidant activity was highest in Sukari (105.99μgGAE/gFW) and lowest in Khalas (90.81μgGAE/gFW). The dominant fungal genera were Aspergillus sp., Rhizopus sp., Penicillium sp. and Sarocladium sp., occurring at 37, 18, 13 and 12% respectively. The highest fungal occurrence was in Barhi (30%) followed by Sukari (29%), Khalas (26%) and Rothana (15%). The TPC had a negative correlation with fungal occurrence whilst the total sugars had a positive correlation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0308-8146
1873-7072
DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.125