Mercury accumulation in Yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) with regards to muscle type, muscle position and fish size

•No variation in Hg species accumulation was detected within the white muscle.•tHg and iHg had higher concentrations (p<0.001) in dark muscle than white muscle.•Positive linear correlations between fish weight and both tHg and MeHg were found.•Yellowfin tuna above 70kg fresh weight are likely to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFood chemistry Vol. 190; pp. 351 - 356
Main Authors Bosch, Adina C., O’Neill, Bernadette, Sigge, Gunnar O., Kerwath, Sven E., Hoffman, Louwrens C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•No variation in Hg species accumulation was detected within the white muscle.•tHg and iHg had higher concentrations (p<0.001) in dark muscle than white muscle.•Positive linear correlations between fish weight and both tHg and MeHg were found.•Yellowfin tuna above 70kg fresh weight are likely to exceed the tHg maximum limit. The concentrations and relationships between individual mercury species and total mercury were investigated in different muscle parts and sizes of Yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares). Fourteen Yellowfin tuna caught in the South Atlantic off the coast of South Africa had an average total Hg (tHg) concentration of 0.77mg/kg wet weight. No differences were detected (p>0.05) in tHg, MethylHg (MeHg) or inorganic Hg (iHg) accumulation among the four white muscle portions across the carcass, but both tHg and iHg were found in higher concentrations (p<0.001) in dark muscle than white muscle. Positive linear correlations with fish weight were found for both tHg (r=0.79, p<0.001) and MeHg (r=0.75, p<0.001) concentrations. A prediction model was formulated to calculate toxic MeHg concentrations from measured tHg concentrations and fish weight (cMeHg=0.073+1.365·tHg−0.008·w). As sampling sites and subsampling methods could affect toxicity measurements, we provide recommendations for sampling guidelines.
ISSN:0308-8146
1873-7072
DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.05.109