Utility of unenhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted MRI in children with sickle cell disease — can it differentiate bone infarcts from acute osteomyelitis?

• Published in: Pediatric radiology Vol. 45; no. 13; pp. 1981 - 1987
• Main Authors: Delgado, Jorge, Bedoya, Maria A., Green, Abby M., Jaramillo, Diego, Ho-Fung, Victor
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.12.2015; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Anemia, Sickle Cell - pathology; Bone and Bones - blood supply; Child; Child, Preschool; Diagnosis, Differential; Female; Humans; Imaging; Infant; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Neuroradiology; Nuclear Medicine; Oncology; Original Article; Osteomyelitis - diagnosis; Pediatrics; Radiology; Retrospective Studies; Ultrasound; Osteomyelitis; Bone infarction; Children; Magnetic resonance imaging; Sickle cell disease
• ISSN: 0301-0449; 1432-1998
• DOI: 10.1007/s00247-015-3423-8

Background Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) are at risk of bone infarcts and acute osteomyelitis. The clinical differentiation between a bone infarct and acute osteomyelitis is a diagnostic challenge. Unenhanced T1-W fat-saturated MR images have been proposed as a potential tool to differentiate bone infarcts from osteomyelitis. Objective To evaluate the reliability of unenhanced T1-W fat-saturated MRI for differentiation between bone infarcts and acute osteomyelitis in children with SCD. Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of 31 children (20 boys, 11 girls; mean age 10.6 years, range 1.1–17.9 years) with SCD and acute bone pain who underwent MR imaging including unenhanced T1-W fat-saturated images from 2005 to 2010. Complete clinical charts were reviewed by a pediatric hematologist with training in infectious diseases to determine a clinical standard to define the presence or absence of osteomyelitis. A pediatric radiologist reviewed all MR imaging and was blinded to clinical information. Based on the signal intensity in T1-W fat-saturated images, the children were further classified as positive for osteomyelitis (low bone marrow signal intensity) or positive for bone infarct (high bone marrow signal intensity). Results Based on the clinical standard, 5 children were classified as positive for osteomyelitis and 26 children as positive for bone infarct (negative for osteomyelitis). The bone marrow signal intensity on T1-W fat-saturated imaging was not significant for the differentiation between bone infarct and osteomyelitis ( P  = 0.56). None of the additional evaluated imaging parameters on unenhanced MRI proved reliable in differentiating these diagnoses. Conclusion The bone marrow signal intensity on unenhanced T1-W fat-saturated MR images is not a reliable criterion to differentiate bone infarcts from osteomyelitis in children.