Total skin electron therapy treatment verification: Monte Carlo simulation and beam characteristics of large non-standard electron fields

• Published in: Physics in medicine & biology Vol. 48; no. 17; pp. 2783 - 2796
• Main Authors: Pavón, Ester Carrasco, Sánchez-Doblado, Francisco, Leal, Antonio, Capote, Roberto, Lagares, Juan Ignacio, Perucha, María, Arráns, Rafael
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bristol IOP Publishing 07.09.2003; Institute of Physics
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Computer Simulation; Electrons - therapeutic use; Humans; Medical sciences; Models, Biological; Models, Statistical; Monte Carlo Method; Mycosis Fungoides - radiotherapy; Phantoms, Imaging; Radiometry - methods; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods; Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Skin Neoplasms - radiotherapy
• ISSN: 0031-9155; 1361-6560
• DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/17/304

Total skin electron therapy (TSET) is a complex technique which requires non-standard measurements and dosimetric procedures. This paper investigates an essential first step towards TSET Monte Carlo (MC) verification. The non-standard 6 MeV 40 x 40 cm2 electron beam at a source to surface distance (SSD) of 100 cm as well as its horizontal projection behind a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) screen to SSD = 380 cm were evaluated. The EGS4 OMEGA-BEAM code package running on a Linux home made 47 PCs cluster was used for the MC simulations. Percentage depth-dose curves and profiles were calculated and measured experimentally for the 40 x 40 cm2 field at both SSD = 100 cm and patient surface SSD = 380 cm. The output factor (OF) between the reference 40 x 40 cm2 open field and its horizontal projection as TSET beam at SSD = 380 cm was also measured for comparison with MC results. The accuracy of the simulated beam was validated by the good agreement to within 2% between measured relative dose distributions, including the beam characteristic parameters (R50, R80, R100, Rp, E0) and the MC calculated results. The energy spectrum, fluence and angular distribution at different stages of the beam (at SSD = 100 cm, at SSD = 364.2 cm, behind the PMMA beam spoiler screen and at treatment surface SSD = 380 cm) were derived from MC simulations. Results showed a final decrease in mean energy of almost 56% from the exit window to the treatment surface. A broader angular distribution (FWHM of the angular distribution increased from 13 degrees at SSD = 100 cm to more than 30 degrees at the treatment surface) was fully attributable to the PMMA beam spoiler screen. OF calculations and measurements agreed to less than 1%. The effect of changing the electron energy cut-off from 0.7 MeV to 0.521 MeV and air density fluctuations in the bunker which could affect the MC results were shown to have a negligible impact on the beam fluence distributions. Results proved the applicability of using MC as a treatment verification tool for complex radiotherapy techniques.