Are physicians following guidelines? A survey of Hepatitis B management strategies
Purpose Practice guidelines for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) assist physicians in management; however, there are also areas where they provide no guidance. This paper aimed to examine treatment preferences for CHB among physicians based upon the Asia Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APAS...
Saved in:
Published in | Hepatology international Vol. 7; no. 2; pp. 451 - 459 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New Delhi
Springer India
01.06.2013
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Purpose
Practice guidelines for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) assist physicians in management; however, there are also areas where they provide no guidance. This paper aimed to examine treatment preferences for CHB among physicians based upon the Asia Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) consensus guidelines 2008.
Methods
A questionnaire was prepared consisting of 18 questions grouped into 8 sections: basic information of participants, the proportion and number of CHB patients on treatment, case scenarios of treatment initiation, preferences for antiviral therapy, scenarios for stopping and continuing antiviral therapy, monitoring patients during therapy, and viral resistance management. The questionnaire was introduced to the APASL 2009 conference delegates.
Results
A total of 508 participants from 34 countries participated in the survey. Lamivudine or peg-interferon monotherapy was the preferred first-line therapy, while lamivudine/adefovir combination was the drug of choice for rescue therapy. Drug efficacy and cost were the most important factors to consider before initiating treatment, while viral resistance had a low priority. In general, the APASL guideline was strictly followed in about 50–60 % of the scenarios (initiating, stopping, or continuing antiviral therapy).
Conclusions
The survey concluded that clinical management preferences differed from APASL guidelines in many instances. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1936-0533 1936-0541 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12072-012-9399-7 |