Are physicians following guidelines? A survey of Hepatitis B management strategies

Purpose Practice guidelines for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) assist physicians in management; however, there are also areas where they provide no guidance. This paper aimed to examine treatment preferences for CHB among physicians based upon the Asia Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APAS...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHepatology international Vol. 7; no. 2; pp. 451 - 459
Main Authors Lee, Keat Hong, Aung, Myat Oo, Lim, Seng Gee
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New Delhi Springer India 01.06.2013
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose Practice guidelines for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) assist physicians in management; however, there are also areas where they provide no guidance. This paper aimed to examine treatment preferences for CHB among physicians based upon the Asia Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) consensus guidelines 2008. Methods A questionnaire was prepared consisting of 18 questions grouped into 8 sections: basic information of participants, the proportion and number of CHB patients on treatment, case scenarios of treatment initiation, preferences for antiviral therapy, scenarios for stopping and continuing antiviral therapy, monitoring patients during therapy, and viral resistance management. The questionnaire was introduced to the APASL 2009 conference delegates. Results A total of 508 participants from 34 countries participated in the survey. Lamivudine or peg-interferon monotherapy was the preferred first-line therapy, while lamivudine/adefovir combination was the drug of choice for rescue therapy. Drug efficacy and cost were the most important factors to consider before initiating treatment, while viral resistance had a low priority. In general, the APASL guideline was strictly followed in about 50–60 % of the scenarios (initiating, stopping, or continuing antiviral therapy). Conclusions The survey concluded that clinical management preferences differed from APASL guidelines in many instances.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1936-0533
1936-0541
DOI:10.1007/s12072-012-9399-7