Bioactive-glass ceramic with two crystalline phases (BioS-2P) for bone tissue engineering

We aimed to evaluate the in vitro osteogenic and osteoinductive potentials of BioS-2P and its ability to promote in vivo bone repair. To investigate osteogenic potential, UMR-106 osteoblastic cells were cultured on BioS-2P and Bioglass 45S5 discs in osteogenic medium. The osteoinductive potential wa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiomedical materials (Bristol) Vol. 12; no. 4; p. 045018
Main Authors Prado Ferraz, Emanuela, Pereira Freitas, Gileade, Camuri Crovace, Murilo, Peitl, Oscar, Dutra Zanotto, Edgar, de Oliveira, Paulo Tambasco, Mateus Beloti, Marcio, Luiz Rosa, Adalberto
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England IOP Publishing 09.08.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We aimed to evaluate the in vitro osteogenic and osteoinductive potentials of BioS-2P and its ability to promote in vivo bone repair. To investigate osteogenic potential, UMR-106 osteoblastic cells were cultured on BioS-2P and Bioglass 45S5 discs in osteogenic medium. The osteoinductive potential was evaluated using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) cultured on BioS-2P, Bioglass 45S5 and polystyrene in non-osteogenic medium. Rat bone calvarial defects were implanted with BioS-2P scaffolds alone or seeded with MSCs. UMR-106 proliferation was similar for both materials, while alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and mineralization were higher for BioS-2P. Bone sialoprotein (BSP), RUNX2 and osteopontin (OPN) gene expression and BSP, OPN, ALP and RUNX2 protein expression were higher on BioS-2P. For MSCs, ALP activity was higher on Bioglass 45S5 than on BioS-2P and was lower on polystyrene. All genes were highly expressed on bioactive glasses compared to polystyrene. BioS-2P scaffolds promoted in vivo bone formation without differences in the morphometric parameters at 4, 8 and 12 weeks. After 8 weeks, the combination of BioS-2P with MSCs did not increase the quantity of new bone compared to the BioS-2P alone. To stimulate osteoblast activity, drive MSC differentiation and promote bone formation, BioS-2P is a good choice as a scaffold for bone tissue engineering.
Bibliography:BMM-101787.R1
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1748-6041
1748-605X
1748-605X
DOI:10.1088/1748-605X/aa768e