Impact of the mandibular divergence on the position of the inferior alveolar nerve and mylohyoid nerve: a computed tomography study and its relevance to bilateral sagittal split osteotomy

• Published in: Surgical and radiologic anatomy (English ed.) Vol. 35; no. 3; pp. 241 - 247
• Main Authors: Oth, Olivier, Louryan, Stéphane, Van Sint Jan, Serge, Rooze, Marcel, Glineur, Régine
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Paris Springer-Verlag 01.04.2013; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Anatomy; Bone surgery; Humans; Imaging; Mandible - diagnostic imaging; Mandible - innervation; Mandible - surgery; Mandibular Nerve - anatomy & histology; Mandibular Osteotomy; Maxillofacial surgery; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Neurology; Original Article; Orthopedics; Radiology; Reference Values; Surgery; Surgical outcomes; Tomography; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Mylohyoid nerve; Computed tomography; Mandibular canal; Inferior alveolar nerve; Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy; Mandibular divergence
• ISSN: 0930-1038; 1279-8517
• DOI: 10.1007/s00276-012-1010-3

Purpose Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is the most common procedure used to treat mandibular deformities. BSSO procedures include the Epker technique and the Dal Pont technique which are the most frequently used. Because of the intramandibular pathway of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN), neurosensory disturbance of the lower lip and chin is the most common complication of BSSO. This study performed quantitative measurements from computed tomographic (CT) data obtained on dry human mandibles. The main aim of the study was to evaluate if mandibular divergence can predict the position of the IAN and the mylohyoid nerve (MHN) to prevent nerve injury. Methods After CT and 3D reconstruction of 65 dry mandibles, 30 measurements were made on 3 planes for each hemi-mandible. This allowed analysis of the IAN and MHN pathways. Three groups of hemi-mandibles were created depending on their divergence, and a statistical analysis was performed. Results Eight out of the 30 measurements showed a significant difference among the 3 groups. There was no significant difference for the remaining 22 measurements. Conclusions The IAN seems to have a more superior position in the groups of mandibular hypo- and hyper-divergence. Orthognathic surgeons should use a more superficial retromolar bone incision in these cases. Finally, the Epker technique would be safer for preserving the MHN in normo- and hypo-divergent patients.