The developmental state is dead, long live the developmental regime! Interpreting Néstor Kirchner's Argentina 2003–2007
The post-crisis administration of Néstor Kirchner (2003–2007) saw significant changes in the political economy of Argentina. After characterising these changes this article attempts to place the evidence within an appropriate meta-theoretical interpretation. The article concludes that while elements...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of international relations and development Vol. 17; no. 2; pp. 191 - 219 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Palgrave Macmillan UK
01.04.2014
Palgrave Macmillan |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The post-crisis administration of Néstor Kirchner (2003–2007) saw significant changes in the political economy of Argentina. After characterising these changes this article attempts to place the evidence within an appropriate meta-theoretical interpretation. The article concludes that while elements of historical forms of political economy exist in Néstor Kirchner's regime — elements of populism, elements of neoliberalism — in its entirety, one must look to other explanations not traditionally associated with Latin America, that is, the developmental regime. Such a conclusion facilitates both an enhanced understanding of post-crisis Argentine political economy, and an opportunity to further develop a developmental regime approach. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1408-6980 1581-1980 |
DOI: | 10.1057/jird.2012.32 |