Reframing the principle of specialisation in legitimation code theory: A blended learning perspective

This study argues that in developing a robust framework for students in a blended learning environment, Structural Alignment (SA) becomes the third principle of specialisation in addition to Epistemic Relation (ER) and Social Relation (SR). We provide an extended code: (ER+/−, SR+/−, SA+/−) that pre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEducation and information technologies Vol. 22; no. 5; pp. 2583 - 2603
Main Authors Owusu-Agyeman, Yaw, Larbi-Siaw, Otu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.09.2017
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1360-2357
1573-7608
DOI10.1007/s10639-016-9563-0

Cover

More Information
Summary:This study argues that in developing a robust framework for students in a blended learning environment, Structural Alignment (SA) becomes the third principle of specialisation in addition to Epistemic Relation (ER) and Social Relation (SR). We provide an extended code: (ER+/−, SR+/−, SA+/−) that present strong classification and framing to the architecture of blended learning while defining the impact of structural alignment in the trajectory. The subjects in this study were 500 undergraduate students drawn from three faculties in a university. Using a Structural Equation Model (SEM), we show that SR, ER and SA redefine the principle of specialisation in Legitimation Code Theory (LCT) which is necessary in enhancing blended learning. We conclude that whereas epistemic and social relations define the knower and knowledge code, structural alignment explains the infrastructure and policy framework that supports knowledge acquisition in a blended learning environment.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1360-2357
1573-7608
DOI:10.1007/s10639-016-9563-0