Intravertebral pneumatocysts of the cervical spine

Introduction The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of intravertebral pneumatocyst (IVP) of the cervical spine by age group, compared with that of intradiscal vacuum (IDV). Methods We investigated 500 consecutive patients who underwent cervical computed tomography (CT) from May 2012...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeuroradiology Vol. 55; no. 11; pp. 1341 - 1344
Main Authors Matsukubo, Yuko, Kashiwagi, Nobuo, Uemura, Masanobu, Tatsumi, Sachiyo, Takahashi, Hiroto, Hyodo, Tomoko, Tomiyama, Noriyuki, Ashikaga, Ryuichiro, Ishii, Kazunari, Murakami, Takamichi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.11.2013
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of intravertebral pneumatocyst (IVP) of the cervical spine by age group, compared with that of intradiscal vacuum (IDV). Methods We investigated 500 consecutive patients who underwent cervical computed tomography (CT) from May 2012 to May2013 for various indications. CT datasets were assessed for the presence of IVPs and IDVs with stratification by age. Results IVPs of the cervical spine were detected in 8 % (7 of 86 subjects) of patients in their forties or below, 30 % (23 of 75) in their fifties, 49 % (67 of 136) in their sixties, 55 % (76 of 137) in their seventies, and 60 % (40 of 66) in their eighties or over. IDVs of the cervical spine were detected in 6, 25, 48, 54, and 57 %, respectively. Coexistence of both phenomena was identified in 4, 17, 33, 40, and 43 %, respectively. Conclusion IVPs of the cervical spine are a common incidental finding, increasing in prevalence with age and more common than IDV in all age groups.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0028-3940
1432-1920
DOI:10.1007/s00234-013-1279-x