Simulation of forest tree species’ bud burst dates for different climate scenarios: chilling requirements and photo-period may limit bud burst advancement

• Published in: International journal of biometeorology Vol. 60; no. 11; pp. 1711 - 1726
• Main Authors: Lange, Maximilian, Schaber, Jörg, Marx, Andreas, Jäckel, Greta, Badeck, Franz-Werner, Seppelt, Ralf, Doktor, Daniel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.11.2016; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Animal Physiology; Biological and Medical Physics; Biometeorology; Biophysics; Climate; Earth and Environmental Science; Environment; Environmental Health; Forests; Germany; Magnoliopsida - growth & development; Meteorology; Models, Theoretical; Original Paper; Phenology; Photoperiod; Plant Leaves - growth & development; Plant Physiology; Plant reproduction; Plant species; Seasons; Spring; Temperature; Trees; Trees - growth & development; Trend; Photo-period; Deciduous forest; Climate scenarios; Phenology; Bud burst
• ISSN: 0020-7128; 1432-1254
• DOI: 10.1007/s00484-016-1161-8

This study investigates whether the assumed increase of winter and spring temperatures is depicted by phenological models in correspondingly earlier bud burst (BB) dates. Some studies assume that rising temperatures lead to an earlier BB, but even later BB has been detected. The phenological model PIM (promoter-inhibitor-model) fitted to the extensive phenological database of the German Weather Service was driven by several climate scenarios. This model accounts for the complicated mechanistic interactions between chilling requirements, temperature and photo-period. It predicts BB with a r 2 between 0.41 and 0.62 and a RMSE of around 1 week, depending on species. Parameter sensitivities depict species dependent interactions between growth and chilling requirements as well as photo-period. A mean trend to earlier BB was revealed for the period 2002– 2100, varying between −0.05 and −0.11 days per year, depending on species. These trends are lower than for the period 1951– 2009. Within climate scenario period, trends are decreasing for beech and chestnut, stagnating for birch and increasing for oak. Results suggest that not fulfilled chilling requirements accompanied by an increasing dependency on photo-period potentially limit future BB advancement. The combination of a powerful phenological model, a large scale phenological database and several climate scenarios, offers new insights into the mechanistic comprehension of spring phenology.