Microalgal-biochar immobilized complex: A novel efficient biosorbent for cadmium removal from aqueous solution

Schematic diagram of the adsorption mechanism with three biosorbents, A: Chlorella sp., B: water hyacinth biochar (WHB); C: Microalgal-biochar immobilized complex (MBIC). [Display omitted] •Microalgal-biochar immobilized complex (MBIC) was used for bioremediation of Cd(II).•The surface potential was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBioresource technology Vol. 244; no. Pt 1; pp. 1031 - 1038
Main Authors Shen, Ying, Li, Huan, Zhu, Wenzhe, Ho, Shih-Hsin, Yuan, Wenqiao, Chen, Jianfeng, Xie, Youping
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Schematic diagram of the adsorption mechanism with three biosorbents, A: Chlorella sp., B: water hyacinth biochar (WHB); C: Microalgal-biochar immobilized complex (MBIC). [Display omitted] •Microalgal-biochar immobilized complex (MBIC) was used for bioremediation of Cd(II).•The surface potential was enhanced by immobilizing the algae to the biochar.•The Cd removability of MBIC was higher than both Chlorella sp. and biochar.•The maximum Cd(II) adsorption capacity of MBIC was 217.41mgg−1. The feasibility of the bioremediation of cadmium (Cd) using microalgal-biochar immobilized complex (MBIC) was investigated. Major operating parameters (e.g., pH, biosorbent dosage, initial Cd(II) concentration and microalgal-biochar ratio) were varied to compare the treatability of viable algae (Chlorella sp.), biochar and MBIC. The biosorption isotherms obtained by using algae or biochar were found to have satisfactory Langmuir predictions, while the best fitting adsorption isotherm model for MBIC was the Sips model. The maximum Cd(II) adsorption capacity of MBIC with a Chlorella sp.: biochar ratio of 2:3 (217.41mgg−1) was higher than that of Chlorella sp. (169.92mgg−1) or biochar (95.82mgg−1) alone. The pseudo-second-order model fitted the biosorption process of MBIC well (R2>0.999). Moreover, zeta potential, SEM and FTIR studies revealed that electrostatic attraction, ion exchange and surface complexation were the main mechanisms responsible for Cd removal when using MBIC.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0960-8524
1873-2976
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.085