Magnesium in dairy cattle nutrition: a meta-analysis on magnesium absorption in dairy cattle and assessment of simple solubility tests to predict magnesium availability from supplemental sources

Supplemental Mg sources are different in bioavailability, and solubility is one of the determining factors. We explored whether and which in vitro solubility tests could reliably differentiate the quality of supplemental Mg sources. In Experiment 1, we compared 3 chemical methods using an acetic aci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of dairy science Vol. 106; no. 12; pp. 8758 - 8773
Main Authors Khiaosa-arda, Ratchaneewan, Ottobonib, Matteo, Verstringec, Stefanie, Grubera, Theresa, Hartingera, Thomas, Humera, Elke, Bruggemanc, Geert, Zebelia, Qendrim
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.12.2023
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Supplemental Mg sources are different in bioavailability, and solubility is one of the determining factors. We explored whether and which in vitro solubility tests could reliably differentiate the quality of supplemental Mg sources. In Experiment 1, we compared 3 chemical methods using an acetic acid solution (50 mL/L, termed Vinegar test), a 1 M ammonium nitrate solution, and an artificial rumen buffer fluid without rumen microbiota. The Mg solubility results suggested the Vinegar test was the best method due to its robustness, simplicity, and reproducibility. In Experiment 2, we validated the reliability of the Vinegar test using 4 MgO sources from Experiment 1 and 12 new MgO sources plus a lab-grade MgO as a standard. Accordingly, we repeated the Vinegar test with short (0.5 h) and long (3.0 h) incubation times on these sources and then conducted ruminal incubations in 24-h batch culture experiments. The repeated Vinegar test resulted in similar results as in Experiment 1. Linear regression across both experiments showed the soluble Mg content (g/kg) = 44.46 (±2.55) × pH – 142.9 (±14.9), root mean square error (RMSE) = 10.2, P slope <0.001, and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) = 0.953. The predictable pH range was from 4 to 6. The equation cannot be applied to low alkaline sources like Mg sulfate and Mg acetate and a group of MgO with exceptionally high alkaline properties showing a cluster of pH above 8.5. Solubility of the MgO sources in the Vinegar test ranged from 5 – 35%, while the 24-h ruminal incubations led to more solubility (15–70%). Nevertheless, the differences among most MgO sources were parallel to the data from the in vitro rumen solubility. Next, we performed a meta-analysis of published studies (21 studies, 94 treatments) to assess the true Mg absorption in vivo and potential factors affecting Mg absorption in dairy cows. It appeared that on average dairy cows absorbed about 20% of the Mg intake (range 10 - 40%), regardless of their lactation status. With newly added data from what was previously done by Schonewille et al. (2008), we revealed a new strategy to predict Mg absorption relative to dietary K as follows: true Mg absorption (g/d) = 0.3395 (±0.025, P < 0.001) × Mg intake (g/d) - 1.9273 (±1.16, P = 0.11) when dietary K ≤20 g/kg DM, and 0.154 (±1.06, P = 0.05) + 0.209 (±0.026, P < 0.001) × Mg intake (g/d) when dietary K >20 g/kg DM (RMSE = 2.19). This strategy improved the accuracy of prediction as compared with the existing prediction (CCC = 0.922 vs. 0.845). Still, over- or underestimations inherent to individual studies were evident and might be related to unaccountable factors especially the quality of supplemental Mg sources. In conclusion, the Vinegar test is a useful tool to rank inorganic Mg sources with alkaline properties. Including in vitro solubility data in Mg nutrition research could help to refine the prediction of bioavailable Mg contents and increase the precision in feed formulation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-0302
1525-3198
DOI:10.3168/jds.2023-23560