T-Wave Variability for the Prediction of Fast Ventricular Arrhythmias Prospective, Observer-Blind Study

Background:The clinical value of T-wave variability (T-var) for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) risk prediction was evaluated.Methods and Results:Three 20-min Holter-ECG-based T-var measurements (I1 at baseline, I2 after 6.5±1.6 months and I3 after 13.1±2.0 months) were done in 121 patients. T-var was d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCirculation Journal Vol. 79; no. 2; pp. 318 - 324
Main Authors Stojkovic, Stefan, Ristl, Robin, Moser, Fabian T., Wolzt, Michael, Wojta, Johann, Schmidinger, Herwig, Pezawas, Thomas
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Japanese Circulation Society 2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background:The clinical value of T-wave variability (T-var) for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) risk prediction was evaluated.Methods and Results:Three 20-min Holter-ECG-based T-var measurements (I1 at baseline, I2 after 6.5±1.6 months and I3 after 13.1±2.0 months) were done in 121 patients. T-var was defined as the amplitude variability of the T-wave with the maximum of T-wave oscillation. The endpoint was a fast, potentially fatal VA (>240 beats/min). During follow-up (20±4 months) 20/121 patients (55% ischemic heart disease, 15% preserved left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF]) had fast VA terminated by ICD or external shock. Although T-var did not differ between patients with vs. without fast VA at baseline (I1: 10.7±7.3 µV vs. 7.8±4.1 µV, P=0.170), patients with fast VA had higher T-var compared to those without fast VA at 2 subsequent measurements (I2: 14.0±6.5 µV vs. 8.2±3.6 µV, P=0.030; I3: 17.0±5.4 µV vs. 8.8±4.6 µV, P=0.004). The increase in T-var between I1 and I2 was higher in patients with fast VA (∆T-var=7.0±9.3 µV), as compared to patients without (∆T-var=0.4±4.3 µV). After adjustment for LVEF in a multiple logistic regression model, the odds ratio for developing fast VA was 1.1 (P=0.056) for each 1-µV increment in T-var at I1.Conclusions:T-var is elevated in patients with fast VA, and both elevation of T-var and increase in T-var may complement LVEF in VA risk stratification. (Circ J 2015; 79: 318–324)
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1346-9843
1347-4820
DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-14-1028