Biventricular Reference Values by Body Surface Area, Age, and Gender in a Large Cohort of Well‐Treated Thalassemia Major Patients Without Heart Damage Using a Multiparametric CMR Approach
Background Cardiac MRI plays a critical role in the management of thalassemic patients. No accurate biventricular reference values are available. Purpose To establish the ranges for normal left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) and LV mass normalized to b...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 53; no. 1; pp. 61 - 70 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken, USA
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.01.2021
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Cardiac MRI plays a critical role in the management of thalassemic patients. No accurate biventricular reference values are available.
Purpose
To establish the ranges for normal left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) and LV mass normalized to body surface area (BSA), age, and gender in a large cohort of well‐treated beta‐thalassemia major (β‐TM) patients without heart damage using a multiparametric MRI.
Study Type
Retrospective/cohort study.
Population
In all, 251 β‐TM patients with no known risk factors or cardiac disease, normal electrocardiogram, no macroscopic myocardial fibrosis, and all cardiac segments with T2* ≥20 msec, and 246 healthy subjects.
Field Strength/Sequence
1.5T/cine steady‐state free precession (SSFP), gradient‐echo T2*, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images.
Assessment
Biventricular end‐diastolic volume, end‐systolic volume, stroke volume, and LV mass were normalized to BSA (EDVI, ESVI, SVI).
Statistical Tests
Comparisons between the two groups was performed with two‐samples t‐test or Wilcoxon's signed rank test. For more than two groups, one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or a Kruskal–Wallis test were applied.
Results
Compared to controls, males with β‐TM showed significantlt higher LVEDVI in all the age groups, while for the other volumes the difference was significant only within one or more age groups. In females the volumes were comparable between β‐TM patients and healthy subjects in all the age groups. In the male β‐TM population we found a significant effect of age on LVEDVI (P = 0.017), LVESVI (P = 0.001), RVESVI (P = 0.029), and RVEF (P = 0.031), while for females none of the biventricular parameters were significantly different among the age groups (LVEDVI: P = 0.614; LVESVI: P = 0.449; LVSVI: P = 0.186; LV mass index: P = 0.071; LVEF: P = 0.059; RVEDVI: P = 0.374; RVESVI: P = 0.180; RVSVI: P = 0.206; RVEF: P = 0.057). In β‐TM patients all biventricular volume indexes as well as the LV mass index were significantly larger in males than in females (P < 0.0001 in all cases). The LV and the RV EF were comparable between the sexes (P = 0.568 and P = 0.268, respectively).
Data Conclusion
Appropriate “normal” reference ranges normalized to BSA, sex, and age are recommended to avoid misdiagnosis of cardiomyopathy in β‐TM patients.
Level of Evidence
4
Technical Efficacy Stage
2 |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1053-1807 1522-2586 1522-2586 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jmri.27169 |