α-Lipoic acid treatment of 31 patients with sore, burning mouth

Objective:  To review a series of patients with sore, burning mouth treated with α‐lipoic acid between 2000 and May 2006 and subjectively evaluate improvement in symptoms. Design:  Retrospective review of medical records of 195 consecutive patients who sought treatment for sore, burning mouth. Treat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOral diseases Vol. 14; no. 6; pp. 529 - 532
Main Authors Steele, JC, Bruce, AJ, Drage, LA, Rogers III, RS
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective:  To review a series of patients with sore, burning mouth treated with α‐lipoic acid between 2000 and May 2006 and subjectively evaluate improvement in symptoms. Design:  Retrospective review of medical records of 195 consecutive patients who sought treatment for sore, burning mouth. Treatment of 47 patients was a prescription/recommendation for α‐lipoic acid. Of these patients, 35 were available for follow‐up. Setting:  Tertiary care academic medical center. Subjects:  Ambulatory patients given prescription /recommendation for α‐lipoic acid 600 mg per day, in divided doses. Main Outcome Measure:  Reported improvement in symptoms documented in medical records and at follow‐up (visits or telephone interviews). Results:  Thirty‐one of the 35 patients (66% of all 47) actually took α‐lipoic acid as recommended. No patient reported a complete alleviation of symptoms. Six (19%) of these 31 patients felt mostly better, five (16%) felt somewhat better, and 14 (45%) reported no difference. Two patients (7%) reported a worsening of symptoms and four (13%) did not know whether there had been improvement. Conclusion:  Eleven of 31 patients (35%) reported benefit from taking α‐lipoic acid. Because we examined only a small number of patients and relied on a subjective outcome assessment, further larger studies using a prospective, randomized, controlled, and double‐blind structure are warranted.
Bibliography:istex:84B7FC21DC8B993C81D6BB3D01562F136A8F8762
ark:/67375/WNG-3P928K58-P
ArticleID:ODI1414
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1354-523X
1601-0825
DOI:10.1111/j.1601-0825.2007.01414.x