Defining a Significant Stenosis in an Autologous Radio-Cephalic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis

The current definition of a significant stenosis in an autologous arteriovenous fistula (aAVF), the percentage narrowing compared with the adjacent “normal” vessel, is inaccurate. We believe a significant stenosis in the aAVF is an absolute minimal luminal diameter determined by the requirements of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSeminars in dialysis Vol. 24; no. 2; pp. 231 - 238
Main Authors Fahrtash, Farzan, Kairaitis, Lukas, Gruenewald, Simon, Spicer, Tim, Sidrak, Hannah, Fletcher, John, Allen, Richard, Swinnen, Jan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The current definition of a significant stenosis in an autologous arteriovenous fistula (aAVF), the percentage narrowing compared with the adjacent “normal” vessel, is inaccurate. We believe a significant stenosis in the aAVF is an absolute minimal luminal diameter determined by the requirements of the hemodialysis pump. To determine what absolute diameter constitutes a hemodynamically significant stenosis in a radio‐cephalic autologous arteriovenous fistula (RC aAVF), the minimal luminal diameter of dysfunctional RC aAVF was compared to that of functional RC aAVF using grayscale and color ultrasound. There were 93 fistulas in study group and 77 in control group. The mean minimum luminal diameter in study group was significantly lower than in control group (2.19 vs. 4.71 mm, p 0.001). With a cutoff value of 2.7 mm, there was 90% sensitivity and 80% specificity in distinguishing functional fistula from dysfunctional fistula. The area under the receiver–operator curve was 90% (CI 84–94%), indicating that a 2.7 mm diameter is accurate in discriminating functional from dysfunctional fistulas. An absolute minimal luminal diameter of 2.7 mm, as determined with grayscale and color ultrasound, is a useful cutoff for defining significant stenosis in a RC aAVF.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-2QD6DG5V-C
istex:23490424CC70AB55EB9A586671E31E5F20B662D7
ArticleID:SDI861
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0894-0959
1525-139X
DOI:10.1111/j.1525-139X.2011.00861.x