Properties and microstructure of eco-cement produced from co-sintered washed fly ash and waste sludge

This study investigated the possibility of recycling washed fly ash, limestone sludge, stone sludge, and iron‐oxide sludge in raw meal for producing Portland cement clinker. All of the major phase components of ordinary Portland cement (OPC)—C3S, C2S, C3A, and C4AF—were identified in each eco‐cement...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental progress & sustainable energy Vol. 35; no. 3; pp. 764 - 771
Main Authors Lin, Kae-Long, Lo, Kang-Wei, Shie, Je-Lueng, Le Anh Tuan, Bui, Hwang, Chao-Lung, Chang, Yu-Min
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study investigated the possibility of recycling washed fly ash, limestone sludge, stone sludge, and iron‐oxide sludge in raw meal for producing Portland cement clinker. All of the major phase components of ordinary Portland cement (OPC)—C3S, C2S, C3A, and C4AF—were identified in each eco‐cement clinker. The compressive strength development showed that the eco‐cement pastes no contained washed fly ash was similar to commercial OPC products. The exothermic peak at 105°C to 440°C corresponded to the coordination change of C‐S‐H gel in the pastes during curing time. The TG/DTA curves showed that the weight loss of the eco‐cement pastes no contained washed fly ash was higher than that of the eco‐cement pastes contained 1% washed fly ash. The Q0 (−70 ppm) species shifted to the Q1 (−80 ppm) and Q2 (−87 ppm) species during curing time. The degrees of hydration of the eco‐cement pastes contained 2 to 4% washed fly ash were lower than that of the eco‐cement pastes no contained washed fly ash. The results of the physicomechanical tests showed that adding the limestone sludge, stone sludge, and iron‐oxide sludge did not negatively affect the quality of the produced cement. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 35: 764–771, 2016
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-X9T3WPWM-F
ArticleID:EP12310
National Science Council of the Republic of China, Taiwan - No. NSC 102-2221-E-197-026-MY2 and 101-2923-I-011-001-MY4.
istex:CA09B7BA180B3988CAF36B12DAD3BB33AFD1AC15
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1944-7442
1944-7450
DOI:10.1002/ep.12310