Effects of manure‐ and lignocellulose‐derived biochars on adsorption and desorption of zinc by acidic types of soil with different properties
There is limited information on zinc (Zn²⁺) adsorption and desorption by different types of soil, especially acidic ones following amendment with manure‐ and lignocellulose‐derived biochars. The novelty of this research is a comparison of the mechanisms of adsorption and desorption of Zn²⁺ by differ...
Saved in:
Published in | European journal of soil science Vol. 67; no. 1; pp. 40 - 50 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.01.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | There is limited information on zinc (Zn²⁺) adsorption and desorption by different types of soil, especially acidic ones following amendment with manure‐ and lignocellulose‐derived biochars. The novelty of this research is a comparison of the mechanisms of adsorption and desorption of Zn²⁺ by different types of acidic soil amended with biochar derived from either swine manure or rape straw. Both biochars were prepared at a pyrolysis temperature of 500°C before being incorporated into four types of soil with low pH (pHH₂O from 4.61 to 5.91) at an incorporation rate of 3%. Following incubation for 360 days, we carried out batch experiments of Zn²⁺ adsorption and desorption. The dual‐mode model (DMM) was more suitable for describing the adsorption isotherms of the four soil types following biochar incorporation than the distributed reactivity model (DRM). Swine‐manure biochar enhanced Zn²⁺ adsorption by soil more than rape‐straw biochar. The increases in Zn²⁺ adsorption by the different soil types following biochar incorporation were in the order Psammaquent > Plinthudult > Paleudalf > Argiustoll soil, whereas it was most difficult to desorb the Zn²⁺ already present, in reverse order: Argiustoll > Paleudalf > Plinthudult > Psammaquent soil. This could be attributed to differences in soil pH, organic carbon, cation exchange capacity (CEC) and soil texture. Both non‐electrostatic and electrostatic adsorption mechanisms were identified in the four soil types. The negative surface charge of biochar is responsible for the electrostatic adsorption, whereas functional oxygen groups and mineral components of biochar were responsible for non‐electrostatic adsorption. Non‐electrostatic adsorption was more important for the swine‐manure biochar than for the rape‐straw biochar, which was attributed to the larger content of mineral components (phosphate and silicate anions) of the former. In conclusion, the biochar effects on Zn²⁺ adsorption depended on the initial Zn²⁺ concentration, soil pH, soil type and biochar origin. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12290 istex:5E687F399F9AF46DCF8275519A0FB5CFF8A37C47 Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities ArticleID:EJSS12290 National Basic Research Programme of China - No. 2014CB441003; No. 2011CB100502 ark:/67375/WNG-2X2Q0JR2-1 Special Fund for Agroscientific Research in the Public Interest - No. 201203045 Table S1. Parameters of DRM models for Zn2+ adsorption by four different acidic soils following addition of swine-manure biochar and rape-straw biochar. |
ISSN: | 1351-0754 1365-2389 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ejss.12290 |