Effects of manure‐ and lignocellulose‐derived biochars on adsorption and desorption of zinc by acidic types of soil with different properties

There is limited information on zinc (Zn²⁺) adsorption and desorption by different types of soil, especially acidic ones following amendment with manure‐ and lignocellulose‐derived biochars. The novelty of this research is a comparison of the mechanisms of adsorption and desorption of Zn²⁺ by differ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of soil science Vol. 67; no. 1; pp. 40 - 50
Main Authors Dai, Z, Meng, J, Shi, Q, Xu, B, Lian, Z, Brookes, P. C, Xu, J.‐M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There is limited information on zinc (Zn²⁺) adsorption and desorption by different types of soil, especially acidic ones following amendment with manure‐ and lignocellulose‐derived biochars. The novelty of this research is a comparison of the mechanisms of adsorption and desorption of Zn²⁺ by different types of acidic soil amended with biochar derived from either swine manure or rape straw. Both biochars were prepared at a pyrolysis temperature of 500°C before being incorporated into four types of soil with low pH (pHH₂O from 4.61 to 5.91) at an incorporation rate of 3%. Following incubation for 360 days, we carried out batch experiments of Zn²⁺ adsorption and desorption. The dual‐mode model (DMM) was more suitable for describing the adsorption isotherms of the four soil types following biochar incorporation than the distributed reactivity model (DRM). Swine‐manure biochar enhanced Zn²⁺ adsorption by soil more than rape‐straw biochar. The increases in Zn²⁺ adsorption by the different soil types following biochar incorporation were in the order Psammaquent > Plinthudult > Paleudalf > Argiustoll soil, whereas it was most difficult to desorb the Zn²⁺ already present, in reverse order: Argiustoll > Paleudalf > Plinthudult > Psammaquent soil. This could be attributed to differences in soil pH, organic carbon, cation exchange capacity (CEC) and soil texture. Both non‐electrostatic and electrostatic adsorption mechanisms were identified in the four soil types. The negative surface charge of biochar is responsible for the electrostatic adsorption, whereas functional oxygen groups and mineral components of biochar were responsible for non‐electrostatic adsorption. Non‐electrostatic adsorption was more important for the swine‐manure biochar than for the rape‐straw biochar, which was attributed to the larger content of mineral components (phosphate and silicate anions) of the former. In conclusion, the biochar effects on Zn²⁺ adsorption depended on the initial Zn²⁺ concentration, soil pH, soil type and biochar origin.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12290
istex:5E687F399F9AF46DCF8275519A0FB5CFF8A37C47
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
ArticleID:EJSS12290
National Basic Research Programme of China - No. 2014CB441003; No. 2011CB100502
ark:/67375/WNG-2X2Q0JR2-1
Special Fund for Agroscientific Research in the Public Interest - No. 201203045
Table S1. Parameters of DRM models for Zn2+ adsorption by four different acidic soils following addition of swine-manure biochar and rape-straw biochar.
ISSN:1351-0754
1365-2389
DOI:10.1111/ejss.12290