Use of automated direct sample introduction with analyte protectants in the GC-MS analysis of pesticide residues

• Published in: Journal of separation science Vol. 28; no. 9-10; pp. 1048 - 1060
• Main Authors: Cajka, T, Mastovska, K, Lehotay, S.J, Hajslova, J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Weinheim WILEY-VCH Verlag 01.06.2005; WILEY‐VCH Verlag
• Subjects: Analyte protectants; Baby food; Calibration; contaminants; Difficult matrix introduction; Direct sample introduction; Food analysis; food contamination; fruits (food); gas chromatography; Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods; infant foods; Large volume injection; mass spectrometry; multiresidue analysis; Pesticide residue analysis; pesticide residues; Pesticide Residues - analysis; Reference Standards; Sensitivity and Specificity; solvents
• ISSN: 1615-9314; 1615-9306; 1615-9314
• DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200500050

Automated large-volume direct sample introduction, or difficult matrix introduction (DMI), was investigated in the determination of 44 pesticide residues possessing a wide range of physico-chemical properties (volatility, polarity, pKa) in fruit-based baby food by means of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) with a quadrupole mass analyzer. DMI has advantages over traditional injection because large volumes (up to 30 microliters) of potentially dirty sample extracts can be injected into the GC-MS, but nonvolatile matrix components that would normally contaminate the inlet are removed after every injection. The extra matrix and glass surfaces involved in DMI, however, make the system more prone to the matrix-induced chromatographic enhancement effect, which adversely affects quantification of several pesticides. To overcome this problem, matrix-matched calibration standards and/or the use of analyte protectants were applied in the DMI approach, and the analysis of extracts was also compared before and after undergoing clean-up by dispersive solid-phase extraction. For best quantification, clean-up was still needed, and the combination of matrix-matching with analyte protectants gave the most reproducible results. Depending on the application, however, the addition of analyte protectants (a mixture of 3-ethoxy-1,2-propanediol, L-gulonic acid 3-lactone, and D-sorbitol) to sample extracts and calibration standards in solvent (non-matrix matched), gave satisfactory quantification for most of the 44 pesticides tested. The lowest calibration levels for 34 of the 44 pesticides were <or= 10 ng/g, which meets the standard required by the European Union Baby Food Directive (2003/13/EC).