Blood lead levels and cognitive functioning: A meta-analysis

The neurotoxicity of lead is well-known and even low exposure levels potentially impact neurocognitive abilities. This metaanalysis aimed to investigate associations between neurocognitive performance and lead exposure in adults and further assess potential effect thresholds. Articles indexed in Med...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Science of the total environment Vol. 668; pp. 678 - 684
Main Authors Vlasak, Thomas, Jordakieva, Galateja, Gnambs, Timo, Augner, Christoph, Crevenna, Richard, Winker, Robert, Barth, Alfred
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 10.06.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The neurotoxicity of lead is well-known and even low exposure levels potentially impact neurocognitive abilities. This metaanalysis aimed to investigate associations between neurocognitive performance and lead exposure in adults and further assess potential effect thresholds. Articles indexed in Medline published until January 2017 reporting associations between lead exposure, blood lead, cognitive abilities and sensomotoric performance were included. The unbiased, standardized mean differences g between lead exposure and control groups extracted from the primary studies were pooled using a three-level, random-effects meta-analytic model with a restricted maximum likelihood estimator. Moderator analyses were conducted using weighted, mixedeffects regression analyses. We identified 22 articles (n=3,849 participants, mean age 39.94±7.87years) published between 1976 and 2014 reporting lead exposure effects on cognitive and sensomotoric parameters (verbal abilities, visuospatial abilities, memory, attention, psychomotor function). On average, blood lead concentrations were 21.09±6.44 μg/dl higher in exposed than in control subjects. After exclusion of outliers, the random-effects three-level meta-analysis identified a significant (p<.001) pooled mean difference between exposure and control groups. Except for a smaller effect in the digit symbol test (p<.05), lead exposure did not result in different outcomes across the examined cognitive measures. Based on a marginally significant (p=.06) effect of difference in exposure levels, a blood lead increase of 10 μg/dl translated into a decline in cognitive abilities of Hedges g=.09. Neurocognitive performance in adults with occupational or environmental lead exposure was significant impaired with regard to the examined parameters. However, further studies are needed for the determination of effect thresholds and reversibility. [Display omitted] •Lead exposure impairs neurocognitive performance in adults.•Impairments do not differ across examined functions.•Estimations of potential thresholds of exposure level are limited.•Assessment of cofounding variables is essential.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.052