Radiation sterilization—computer evaluation of ISO 11137 dose setting method 1 and ISO/TR 13409 method for substantiation of 25 kGy

Computer evaluations of ISO dose setting/substantiation methods, involving challenging them with hypothetical microbial populations of various sizes and resistances, have shown the methods to be generally reliable and safe. However, the ability to Method 1 to detect at a sterility assurance level (S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRadiation physics and chemistry (Oxford, England : 1993) Vol. 54; no. 1; pp. 83 - 94
Main Authors Aoshuang, Yan, Tallentire, Alan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 1999
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0969-806X
1879-0895
DOI10.1016/S0969-806X(98)00203-5

Cover

More Information
Summary:Computer evaluations of ISO dose setting/substantiation methods, involving challenging them with hypothetical microbial populations of various sizes and resistances, have shown the methods to be generally reliable and safe. However, the ability to Method 1 to detect at a sterility assurance level (SAL) of 10 −2 the occurrence of populations of resistances greater than that of the standard distribution of resistances (SDR) decreases with decreasing bioburden level. The ISO method for substantiation of 25 kGy operates correctly for populations of high bioburden levels whose resistances are either greater or lower than that of the SDR. At low bioburden levels, however, the method can provide “incorrect” results—substantiation is rejected even though an SAL of 10 −6 or less is obtained at 25 kGy. This occurs because there is no direct relationship between the outcome of the verification dose experiment and attainment at 25 kGy of an SAL of 10 −6.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0969-806X
1879-0895
DOI:10.1016/S0969-806X(98)00203-5