Effect of cross polarization radiofrequency phases on signal phase

Utilizing phases of radio frequency (RF) pulses to manipulate spin dynamics is routine in NMR and MRI, leading to spectacular techniques like phase cycling. In a very different area, cross polarization (CP) also has a long history as part of a vast number of solid-state NMR pulse sequences. However,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSolid state nuclear magnetic resonance Vol. 117; p. 101771
Main Authors Shekar, S. Chandra, Zhao, Wancheng, Weldeghiorghis, Thomas K., Wang, Tuo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01.02.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Utilizing phases of radio frequency (RF) pulses to manipulate spin dynamics is routine in NMR and MRI, leading to spectacular techniques like phase cycling. In a very different area, cross polarization (CP) also has a long history as part of a vast number of solid-state NMR pulse sequences. However, a detailed study devoted to the effect of CP RF phases on NMR signal, seems not to be readily available. From first principles, we arrive at a simple dependence of NMR signal on arbitrary CP RF phases, for static and MAS conditions, accompanied by experimental verification. In the process, the CP propagator emerges as a product of RF “pulses” and a period of “free precession”, conforming to coherence transfer pathway theory. The theoretical expressions may lend confidence for dealing with CP blocks with tunable phases in pulse sequences. [Display omitted] •Effect of arbitrary RF phases during CP NMR explored from first principles.•S-spin NMR signal acquires same phase as arbitrary RF phases during CP.•This holds for both static and MAS, as evolution operator structure is preserved.•Extensively experimentally validated for 1H-X(=13C, 15N, 31P) CP (static and MAS).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0926-2040
1527-3326
DOI:10.1016/j.ssnmr.2021.101771