Investigating the utility of Anchored Hybrid Enrichment data to investigate the relationships among the Killifishes (Actinopterygii: Cyprinodontiformes), a globally distributed group of fishes

• Published in: Molecular phylogenetics and evolution Vol. 173; p. 107482
• Main Authors: Piller, Kyle R., Parker, Elyse, Lemmon, Alan R., Lemmon, Emily Moriarty
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.08.2022
• Subjects: Cyprinodontiformes; Phylogenetics; Targeted Sequencing; Phylogenetics; Cyprinodontiformes; Targeted Sequencing
• ISSN: 1055-7903; 1095-9513
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2022.107482

[Display omitted] •Cyprinodontiformes are a monophyletic group.•Anchored Hybrid Enrichment data support novel sets of relationships among the families.•Strong statistical support for nodes conceals extensive genealogical conflict in the data.•Interrogation of gene tree heterogeneity is an essential step in phylogenetic inference. The Killifishes (Cyprinodontiformes) are a diverse and well-known group of fishes that contains sixteen families inclusive of Anablepidae, Aphaniidae Aplocheilidae, Cubanichthyidae, Cyprinodontidae, Fluviphylacidae, Fundulidae, Goodeidae, Nothobranchiidae, Orestiidae, Pantanodontidae, Poeciliidae, Procatopodidae, Profundulidae, Rivulidae, and Valenciidae and more than 1,200 species that are globally distributed in tropical and temperate, freshwater and estuarine habitats. The evolutionary relationships among the families within the group, based on different molecular and morphological data sets, have remained uncertain. Therefore, the objective of this study was to use a targeted approach, anchored hybrid enrichment, to investigate the phylogenetic relationships among the families within the Cyprindontiformes. This study included more than 100 individuals, representing all sixteen families within the Cyprinodontiformes, including many recently diagnosed families. We recovered an average of 244 loci per individual. These data were submitted to phylogenetic analyses (RaxML and ASTRAL) and although we recovered many of the same relationships as in previous studies of the group, several novel sets of relationships for other families also were recovered. In addition, two well-established clades (Suborders Cyprinodontoidei and Aplocheilodei) were recovered as monophyletic and are in agreement with most previous studies. We also assessed the degree of gene tree discordance in our dataset to evaluate support for alternative topological hypotheses for interfamilial relationships within the Cyprinodontiformes using a variety of different analyses. The results from this study will provide a robust, historical framework needed to investigate a plethora of biogeographic, taxonomic, ecological, and physiological questions for this group of fishes.