Impact of urban development on aquatic macroinvertebrates in south eastern Australia: degradation of in-stream habitats and comparison with non-urban streams

Internationally, waterways within urban areas are subject to broad-scale environmental impairment from urban land uses. In this study, we used in-stream macroinvertebrates as surrogates to measure the aquatic health of urban streams in the established suburbs of northern Sydney, in temperate south e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAquatic ecology Vol. 44; no. 4; pp. 685 - 700
Main Authors Davies, Peter J, Wright, Ian A, Findlay, Sophia J, Jonasson, Olof J, Burgin, Shelley
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands 01.12.2010
Springer Netherlands
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1386-2588
1573-5125
DOI10.1007/s10452-009-9307-y

Cover

More Information
Summary:Internationally, waterways within urban areas are subject to broad-scale environmental impairment from urban land uses. In this study, we used in-stream macroinvertebrates as surrogates to measure the aquatic health of urban streams in the established suburbs of northern Sydney, in temperate south eastern Australia. We compared these with samples collected from streams flowing in adjacent naturally vegetated catchments. Macroinvertebrates were collected over a 30-month period from riffle, edge and pool rock habitats and were identified to the family level. Macroinvertebrate assemblages were assessed against the influence of imperviousness and other catchment and water quality variables. The study revealed that urban streams were significantly impaired compared with those that flowed through naturally vegetated non-urban catchments. Urban streams had consistently lower family richness, and sensitive guilds were rare or missing. We found that variation in community assemblages among the in-stream habitats (pool edges, riffles and pool rocks) were more pronounced within streams in naturally vegetated catchments than in urban waterways.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10452-009-9307-y
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1386-2588
1573-5125
DOI:10.1007/s10452-009-9307-y