Debate: Can sustainable tourism include flying?

Can sustainable tourism include flying? was the question addressed by the debate at the University of Central Lancashire (University of Central Lancashire), UK on March 30th 2012. There was an unexpected degree of consensus among the speakers that tourism had severe environmental impacts, mainly fro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTourism management perspectives Vol. 6; pp. 65 - 67
Main Author Guiver, Jo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2013
Subjects
Aviation
Debate
Sustainability
Tourism
British Isles, England, Lancashire
British Isles
Tourism
Aviation
Sustainability
Debate
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Can sustainable tourism include flying? was the question addressed by the debate at the University of Central Lancashire (University of Central Lancashire), UK on March 30th 2012. There was an unexpected degree of consensus among the speakers that tourism had severe environmental impacts, mainly from flying and that many countries currently benefitting from tourism development were likely to suffer from climate change. They also agreed that corporate tourism often diverted funds from destination areas into their own profits. Those arguing for flying stressed the balance of environmental, social and economic benefits, while those arguing against prioritised the environmental damage of increasing aviation. The pro-fliers were optimistic about technological advances in aircraft and fuels but the others doubted their potential to reduce emissions from current or increased levels of aviation. Both sides admitted behavioural change was difficult, but saw hope in recent trends.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2211-9736
2211-9744
DOI:10.1016/j.tmp.2012.10.005