Clashing coalitions: a discourse analysis of an artificial groundwater recharge project in Finland

• Published in: Local environment Vol. 21; no. 11; pp. 1317 - 1331
• Main Authors: Kurki, Vuokko, Takala, Annina, Vinnari, Eija
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Abingdon Routledge 01.11.2016; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: Associations; Civil society; Coalitions; Conflict; Discourse analysis; Ecological monitoring; Environmental conflict; Environmental policy; Experts; Finland; Groundwater; Groundwater recharge; Infrastructure; infrastructure projects; Knowledge; Knowledge management; knowledge production; Local government; Modernization; Policy making; Production; Public policy; Residents; Finland; ANE, Finland, Turku-Pori, Turku; British Isles, England, Oxford; ANE, Finland; British Isles
• ISSN: 1354-9839; 1469-6711
• DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2015.1113516

The purpose of this paper is to increase understanding of the dynamics of knowledge production in the context of large-scale environmental projects causing local conflict. In particular, the paper analyses the discourse coalitions that formed around an artificial groundwater recharge project for the Turku Region in Finland. The material for this study consists of over 400 articles and opinion pieces which were collected from local and regional newspapers between 1999 and 2010. The articles were analysed by using Hajer's [1995. The politics of environmental discourse. Ecological modernisation and the policy process. Oxford, UK: Clarendon] discursive framework, and the analysis was complemented with the concept of knowledge coalition by Van Buuren and Edelenbos [2004. Conflicting knowledge. Why is joint knowledge production such a problem? Science and Public Policy, 31 (4), 289-299]. Results of the study indicate that knowledge coalitions were formed among the researchers, lay residents, and policy-makers, and they all utilised similar expertise-based factual arguments to support their cause. Thus, the paper participates in the academic discussion on the use and interpretation of expert knowledge in environmental policy-making by reshaping the division between experts and lay residents.