Wireless Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN): A Proof-of-Concept Randomized Clinical Trial

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) affects approximately 30 to 60% of people who receive neurotoxic chemotherapy. CIPN is associated with impaired quality of life and function and has few effective treatments. This 6-site, subject and assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial (RCT) w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe journal of pain Vol. 25; no. 5; p. 104431
Main Authors Gewandter, Jennifer S., Culakova, Eva, Davis, Jenae N., Gada, Umang, Guido, Joseph J., Bearden, James D., Burnette, Brain, Shah, Dhaval, Morrow, Gary R., Mustian, Karen, Sluka, Kathleen A., Mohile, Nimish
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.05.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) affects approximately 30 to 60% of people who receive neurotoxic chemotherapy. CIPN is associated with impaired quality of life and function and has few effective treatments. This 6-site, subject and assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial (RCT) was designed to assess 1) preliminary efficacy (ie, alpha pre-specified at .2) of a wearable, app-controlled, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) device for chronic CIPN and 2) feasibility of conducting a confirmatory trial within the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) (NCT 04367480). The primary outcome was the EORTC-CIPN20. The main secondary outcomes were individual symptoms assessed daily (via 0–10 numeric rating scales). The primary analysis was an analysis of covariance (outcome: EORTC-CIPN20, fixed effect: arm, covariates: baseline EORTC-CIPN20 and site). Secondary analyses used a similar analysis of covariance models (excluding site) for each symptom on subgroups of subjects with ≥4 out of 10 for that symptom at baseline. 142 eligible subjects were randomized and received a device; 130 (91%) completed the study. The difference between groups in the EORCT-CIPN20 at the endpoint (placebo-active) was 1.05 (95% Confidence Interval: −.56, 2.67; P = .199). The difference between groups for the individual symptoms was as follows: hot/burning pain: 1.37 (−.33, 3.08; P = .112), sharp/shooting pain: 1.21 (−.37, 2.79; P = .128), cramping: 1.35 (−.32, 3.02; P = .110), tingling: .23 (−.61, 1.08; P = .587), numbness: .27 (−.51, 1.05; P = .492). An RCT of an app-controlled TENS device for chronic CIPN with excellent retention is feasible in the NCORP. Preliminary efficacy evidence suggests that TENS is promising for pain and cramping from CIPN. A confirmatory RCT of TENS for painful CIPN is highly warranted. Daily, home-based TENS therapy demonstrates promising efficacy for painful CIPN symptoms in this proof-of-concept randomized clinical trial. Future confirmatory trial is warranted. •This trial provides evidence for the preliminary efficacy of TENS for painful CIPN symptoms.•This trial demonstrates feasibility of conducting a confirmatory RCT of TENS for painful CIPN.•No effect of TENS on numbness or tingling associated with CIPN was observed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1526-5900
1528-8447
1528-8447
DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2023.11.014