Optimal sizing of building integrated hybrid PV/diesel generator system for zero load rejection for Malaysia

► We developed a sizing technique for hybrid PV/diesel generator systems for Malaysia. ► We made a brief feasibility comparison between the proposed system and other systems. ► We developed an optimisation problem subject for zero load rejection. ► This work provides optimum size for hybrid PV/diese...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnergy and buildings Vol. 43; no. 12; pp. 3430 - 3435
Main Authors Khatib, Tamer, Mohamed, A., Sopian, K., Mahmoud, M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier B.V 01.12.2011
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:► We developed a sizing technique for hybrid PV/diesel generator systems for Malaysia. ► We made a brief feasibility comparison between the proposed system and other systems. ► We developed an optimisation problem subject for zero load rejection. ► This work provides optimum size for hybrid PV/diesel generator systems for Malaysia. In this research, an optimisation for building integrated hybrid PV/diesel generator system for zero load rejection for Malaysia is performed. The optimisation is performed considering a loss-of-load probability (LLP) less than 0.01. However, the daily averages of solar energy for Malaysia and a mathematical model of a hybrid PV/diesel generator system are used in this optimisation. The optimisation presented in this paper aims to calculate the optimum capacities of a PV array and diesel generator, which investigate the minimum system cost. An optimisation problem in terms of system units’ cost is solved graphically in this study. Moreover, the optimised system is compared to other energy source choices to highlight its feasibility. The recommended configuration of a PV/diesel system located in Malaysia is C A = 1.2, C DG = 0.3, while the optimum C B is 0.1. The results of the optimisation show that a PV/diesel generator choice is more feasible compared to a standalone PV system or diesel generator system because it reduces the system cost by 35%.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0378-7788
DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.09.008