Karyotype changes during long-term targeted therapy of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib

• Published in: Leukemia & lymphoma Vol. 50; no. 6; pp. 952 - 965
• Main Authors: Pie kowska-Grela, Barbara, Rygier, Jolanta, Woroniecka, Renata, Grygalewicz, Beata, Pastwi ska, Anna, Krawczyk, Paulina, Ceglerek, Bernadeta, Sefery ska, Ilona, Sikorska, Anna, Konopka, Lech
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Informa UK Ltd 01.01.2009; Taylor & Francis
• Subjects: Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use; Benzamides; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22 - genetics; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 9 - genetics; CML; Disease Progression; Female; Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl - genetics; Humans; imatinib; Imatinib Mesylate; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; Karyotype changes; Karyotyping; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive - drug therapy; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive - genetics; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive - pathology; Male; Piperazines - therapeutic use; Pyrimidines - therapeutic use; Risk Factors; submicroscopic deletion; Time Factors; Translocation, Genetic; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 1042-8194; 1029-2403
• DOI: 10.1080/10428190902838384

The main risk factors during imatinib therapy of chronic myeloid leukemia are still subject to discussion. A group of 39 patients was cytogenetically examined and monitored before and during long-term treatment with imatinib. The cytogenetic response was investigated using karyotype analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridisation method. Different therapy effects were shown for three subgroups distinguished before the start of treatment: patients with the sole translocation t(9;22) with a typical pattern of BCR ABL fusion vs. patients with submicroscopic deletion in the fusion region ABL BCR of the sole t(9;22) vs. patients with aberrations additional to t(9;22) and without submicroscopic deletion. Of the two group with sole t(9;22) the group with deletion in the ABL BCL region suffered a poorer treatment outcome than the group without deletion. The risk of progression of cytogenetic changes in group with deletion was more than nine times higher than in patients with sole t(9;22) without deletion (statistically significant).