Individual differences in spatial cognition influence mental simulation of language

•We investigated visual perspective taking in embodied simulation of language.•Subjects were successfully classified into groups based on spatial cognitive biases.•We find that these biases influenced how perspective was simulated in comprehension.•Methodologically, results draw attention to the imp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCognition Vol. 142; pp. 110 - 122
Main Authors Vukovic, Nikola, Williams, John N.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.09.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0010-0277
1873-7838
1873-7838
DOI10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.017

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•We investigated visual perspective taking in embodied simulation of language.•Subjects were successfully classified into groups based on spatial cognitive biases.•We find that these biases influenced how perspective was simulated in comprehension.•Methodologically, results draw attention to the importance of individual differences. The factors that contribute to perceptual simulation during sentence comprehension remain underexplored. Extant research on perspective taking in language has largely focused on linguistic constraints, such as the role of pronouns in guiding perspective adoption. In the present study, we identify preferential usage of egocentric and allocentric reference frames in individuals, and test the two groups on a standard sentence-picture verification task. Across three experiments, we show that individual biases in spatial reference frame adoption observed in non-linguistic tasks influence visual simulation of perspective in language. Our findings suggest that typically reported grand-averaged effects may obscure important between-subject differences, and support proposals arguing for representational pluralism, where perceptual information is integrated dynamically and in a way that is sensitive to contextual and especially individual constraints.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0010-0277
1873-7838
1873-7838
DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.017