Individual differences in spatial cognition influence mental simulation of language
•We investigated visual perspective taking in embodied simulation of language.•Subjects were successfully classified into groups based on spatial cognitive biases.•We find that these biases influenced how perspective was simulated in comprehension.•Methodologically, results draw attention to the imp...
Saved in:
Published in | Cognition Vol. 142; pp. 110 - 122 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Netherlands
Elsevier B.V
01.09.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0010-0277 1873-7838 1873-7838 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.017 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •We investigated visual perspective taking in embodied simulation of language.•Subjects were successfully classified into groups based on spatial cognitive biases.•We find that these biases influenced how perspective was simulated in comprehension.•Methodologically, results draw attention to the importance of individual differences.
The factors that contribute to perceptual simulation during sentence comprehension remain underexplored. Extant research on perspective taking in language has largely focused on linguistic constraints, such as the role of pronouns in guiding perspective adoption. In the present study, we identify preferential usage of egocentric and allocentric reference frames in individuals, and test the two groups on a standard sentence-picture verification task. Across three experiments, we show that individual biases in spatial reference frame adoption observed in non-linguistic tasks influence visual simulation of perspective in language. Our findings suggest that typically reported grand-averaged effects may obscure important between-subject differences, and support proposals arguing for representational pluralism, where perceptual information is integrated dynamically and in a way that is sensitive to contextual and especially individual constraints. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0010-0277 1873-7838 1873-7838 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.017 |