Improving the estimation of canopy cover from UAV-LiDAR data using a pit-free CHM-based method

Accurate and rapid estimation of canopy cover (CC) is crucial for many ecological and environmental models and for forest management. Unmanned aerial vehicle-light detecting and ranging (UAV-LiDAR) systems represent a promising tool for CC estimation due to their high mobility, low cost, and high po...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of digital earth Vol. 14; no. 10; pp. 1477 - 1492
Main Authors Cai, Shangshu, Zhang, Wuming, Jin, Shuangna, Shao, Jie, Li, Linyuan, Yu, Sisi, Yan, Guangjian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Taylor & Francis 03.10.2021
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Taylor & Francis Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Accurate and rapid estimation of canopy cover (CC) is crucial for many ecological and environmental models and for forest management. Unmanned aerial vehicle-light detecting and ranging (UAV-LiDAR) systems represent a promising tool for CC estimation due to their high mobility, low cost, and high point density. However, the CC values from UAV-LiDAR point clouds may be underestimated due to the presence of large quantities of within-crown gaps. To alleviate the negative effects of within-crown gaps, we proposed a pit-free CHM-based method for estimating CC, in which a cloth simulation method was used to fill the within-crown gaps. To evaluate the effect of CC values and within-crown gap proportions on the proposed method, the performance of the proposed method was tested on 18 samples with different CC values (40−70%) and 6 samples with different within-crown gap proportions (10−60%). The results showed that the CC accuracy of the proposed method was higher than that of the method without filling within-crown gaps (R 2  = 0.99 vs 0.98; RMSE = 1.49% vs 2.2%). The proposed method was insensitive to within-crown gap proportions, although the CC accuracy decreased slightly with the increase in within-crown gap proportions.
ISSN:1753-8947
1753-8955
DOI:10.1080/17538947.2021.1921862