Understanding development through the language of Habermas and Bourdieu: Insights from Nepal's Leasehold Forestry Programme

• Published in: International development planning review Vol. 27; no. 4; pp. 479 - 497
• Main Authors: Ojha, Hemant, Cameron, John, Bhattarai, Basundhara
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Liverpool Liverpool University Press 01.01.2005; Liverpool University Press (UK)
• Subjects: Appreciation; Bourdieu, Pierre; Bourdieu, Pierre (1930-2002); Case studies; Citizen participation; Development Programs; Development projects; Development studies; Disadvantaged; Economic development; Empowerment; Forestry; Forestry economics; Forests and forestry; Habermas, Jurgen; Households; Local communities; Nepal; Philosophers; Politics; Poverty; Poverty alleviation; Practice; Project evaluation; Research trends; Social theory; Technocracy; Technology transfer; Theory; Nepal
• ISSN: 1474-6743; 1478-3401
• DOI: 10.3828/idpr.27.4.5

Development approaches have dramatically shifted from the technology transfer models of the 1950s to empowerment models initiated in the late 1990s. This paper seeks to establish that, despite a growing appreciation of 'political' approaches to development, the actual ways in which development projects are designed and implemented constrain genuine deliberations through which poorer and more disadvantaged people could have taken greater control of their lives. Taking a case study of the Leasehold Forestry Programme in Nepal, this paper demonstrates how developmental practices legitimated by claims to technical knowledge restrict deliberative processes and prevent improvements in the livelihoods of the poorest households. The paper combines Bourdieu's theory of social practices with Habermas' ideas on deliberation to explain how developmental practices have/can become too technocratic, providing limited spaces for the subjects of development to negotiate and define the processes and outcomes that best fit their situations.