Two Principles of Early Moral Education: A Condition for the Law, Reflection and Autonomy
We establish the thesis that in moral education, particularly in the first years of the child’s development, unreflexive acts or unreflexiveness in certain behaviours of adults is a condition for the development of the personality structure and virtues that enable autonomous ethical reflection and a...
Saved in:
Published in | Studies in philosophy and education Vol. 34; no. 1; pp. 9 - 29 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Dordrecht
Springer Netherlands
01.01.2015
Springer Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0039-3746 1573-191X |
DOI | 10.1007/s11217-014-9421-8 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We establish the thesis that in moral education, particularly in the first years of the child’s development, unreflexive acts or
unreflexiveness
in certain behaviours of adults is a condition for the development of the personality structure and virtues that enable autonomous ethical reflection and a relation to the Other. With the notion of
unreflexiveness
we refer to
resolvedness
in the response of adults when it is necessary to establish a limit, or cut, in the child’s demand for pleasure, as well as to
resolvedness
as one of the structurally essential elements in behaviours with which the adult subordinates the child to the symbolic order or language. In philosophy, a symptomatic position in this context is represented by Kant’s theory of education. On the basis of the “traditional” concept of “negative education”, and through Freud’s and Lacan’s psychoanalytic concepts, we identify two principles that should, in contemporary times, be an essential part of the moral educational behaviours of adults: (1) the principle of a
delimited
response to the child’s demand for the satisfaction of pleasure, and (2) the principle of reasoned, reflected, but nevertheless certain, persevering, resolved
unreflexiveness
in the subordination of the child’s desire to the symbolic order (the discourse). On the basis of the preceding analysis, we highlight certain consequences of this structure of the subject for the contexts of particular theoretical discussions and for school practice. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0039-3746 1573-191X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11217-014-9421-8 |